2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of asymmetric strange–antistrange sea to the NuTeV anomaly

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
57
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is successful in explaining numerous problems, including the violation of the Gottfried sum rule from the aspect of flavor asymmetry in the nucleon sea [24,25], the proton spin crisis [26][27][28], and the NuTeV anomaly resulting from the strange-antistrange asymmetry [13], and has been widely recognized as an effective theory of QCD at the low-energy scale.…”
Section: Isospin Symmetry Breaking In the Chiral Quark Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model is successful in explaining numerous problems, including the violation of the Gottfried sum rule from the aspect of flavor asymmetry in the nucleon sea [24,25], the proton spin crisis [26][27][28], and the NuTeV anomaly resulting from the strange-antistrange asymmetry [13], and has been widely recognized as an effective theory of QCD at the low-energy scale.…”
Section: Isospin Symmetry Breaking In the Chiral Quark Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported sin 2 θ W = 0.2277 ± 0.0013 (stat) ± 0.0009 (syst) has approximately 3 standard deviations above the world average value sin 2 θ W = 0.2227±0.0004 measured in other electroweak processes. This remarkable deviation is called the NuTeV anomaly and was discussed in a number of papers from various aspects, including new physics beyond the standard model [8], the nuclear effect [9], nonisoscalar targets [10], and strange-antistrange asymmetry [11][12][13]. Moreover, the possible influence of ISB on this measurement was also studied in a series of papers [14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Using an effective chiral quark model with constituent quarks coupling to Goldstone bosons, Ding et al [33] found S − ≈ (4 − 9) × 10 −3 , depending on the input used for bare constituent quark distributions. Wakamatsu [34] used an SU(3) chiral quark soliton model with an effective mass difference parameter between the strange and nonstrange quarks to obtain the range S − = (2.5 − 5.5) × 10 −3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We divide these studies into two groups. One is the study mainly focusing on the nonperturbative process that is believed to be able to produce an asymmetric intrinsic strange sea [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The other is the next-to-next-to-leading order perturbative evolution process which is pointed out to be able to cause an extrinsic strange sea asymmetry [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%