2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12613-011-0491-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of austenitizing temperature on microstructure in 16Mn steel treated by cerium

Abstract: The change of inclusions and microstructure of 16Mn steel treated by Ce were observed, and the effect of austenitizing temperature on the microstructure was also examined. The results show that the inclusions are transformed from Si-Mn-Al composite oxide and MnS into AlCeO 3 , Ce 2 O 2 S, and MnS composite inclusions after being treated by Ce. Plenty of intragranular ferrites are formed in 16Mn steel containing ~0.017wt% Ce. A large amount of intragranular acicular ferrites are formed after being austenitized … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonmetallic oxides have been considered being harmful to the ductility, toughness, and fatigability of steel because of their high melting point and hardness [1]. However, in 1990, the technology of oxide metallurgy was proposed to utilize the positive effect of the fine oxide to refine the grain [2][3][4]. Due to the perspective prospect, this technology has been a subject of intense study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonmetallic oxides have been considered being harmful to the ductility, toughness, and fatigability of steel because of their high melting point and hardness [1]. However, in 1990, the technology of oxide metallurgy was proposed to utilize the positive effect of the fine oxide to refine the grain [2][3][4]. Due to the perspective prospect, this technology has been a subject of intense study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AF tends to nucleate on the inclusions with low lattice mismatch against α-Fe. The lattice mismatch of TiN, MgO•Al 2 O 3 , MgO, CeAlO 3 and Ce 2 O 2 S with α-Fe were 3.9% [29], 0.6% [30], 4.0% [13], 7.25% [20] and 1.9% [31], respectively, which were in favor of AF nucleation. However, the lattice mismatch between MnS and α-Fe was 8.9% [30], causing pure MnS to not act as the nucleus of AF nucleation.…”
Section: Composition Size and Number Density Of Effective Inclusionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The low mismatch mechanism means studying the lattice structure matching degree between non-metallic inclusions and α-Fe, and it is conducive to the reduction of interface energy and stress energy required for ferrite nucleation with a high matching degree [67]. For example, the mismatches between Ce 2 O 3 , Ce 2 O 2 S, CeAlO 3 , and α-Fe are only 4.1%, 1.2%, and 7.0%, respectively, so that they all have the chance to effectively induce the particles of AF [68]. Thus, the possibility of ferrite nucleation induced by inclusions can be explained theoretically by calculating the mismatches between different inclusions and α-Fe.…”
Section: Development Of Re Oxide Metallurgy Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%