“…It is seen that, the present calculation is in agreement with experimental and theoretical values (Settaouti and Settaouti, 2005), (Aschwanden, 1985), (Shimozuma et al, 1982), (Siddagangappa et al, 1982), but the theoretical results of (Itoh et al, 1993) lower than that of present results for all range of E/N values. which (α/N=η/N) is obtained in the present calculation is approximately equal to (361Td), in agreement with the results of: 361Td (Aschwanden, 1985), 362 Td (Tezcan et al, 2010), 362 Td (Itoh et al, 1993), 361Td (Mohammed, 2009), 362 Td (Itoh et al, 1988). The effective ionization coefficient is almost zero, since ionizing collisions are balanced by attaching collisions, and for E/N values smaller than the (E/N) limit , attachment processes become dominant, yielding negative values for the effective ionization coefficient as E/N is decreased and; on the other hand, for E/N values above the (E/N) limit , the effective ionization coefficient increases with increasing E/N values where the ionization collisions become dominant and the effect of the attachment processes is not significant.…”