2022
DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of blended learning on student performance in K‐12 settings: A meta‐analysis

Abstract: Background: Blended learning programs in Kindergarten through Grade 12 (K-12) classrooms are growing in popularity; however, previous studies assessing their effects have yielded inconsistent results. Further, their effects have not been completely quantitatively synthesized and evaluated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of implementing the HL strategy (experimental class) demonstrates that the hybrid strategy is appropriate for millennial students (generation Z as digital natives), or students born between 1995 and 2010. This supports several previous studies [14][15]. The HL strategy is superior to the typical classroom or face-to-face class in terms of active learning, student learning results, and learning satisfaction [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The success of implementing the HL strategy (experimental class) demonstrates that the hybrid strategy is appropriate for millennial students (generation Z as digital natives), or students born between 1995 and 2010. This supports several previous studies [14][15]. The HL strategy is superior to the typical classroom or face-to-face class in terms of active learning, student learning results, and learning satisfaction [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This supports several previous studies [14][15]. The HL strategy is superior to the typical classroom or face-to-face class in terms of active learning, student learning results, and learning satisfaction [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It includes three categories: affective domain, behavioral domain, and cognitive domain. Digital technologies affect different domains of students’ learning performance (Li & Wang, 2022). So, MST could generate different impacts on different learning outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rahman et al (2020) stated that there are significant differences in learning motivation and learning achievement between classes that use the face-to-face learning model in classes that use BL causing students' learning motivation to increase. BL is an effective way to improve student performance compared to traditional faceto-face learning (F2F) (Li & Wang, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%