1982
DOI: 10.1119/1.12754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of boundary conditions on the behavior of Bloch electrons

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inFlow behavior of an Eyring fluid in a nanotube: The effect of the slip boundary condition Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 133105 (2007); 10.1063/1.2717019 Effect of boundary conditions on the classical skin depth and nonlocal behavior in inductively coupled plasmas Phys. Plasmas 12, 094503 (2005); 10.1063/1.2052247 Variational methods and boundary conditions for Bloch waves in composite materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as shown by Churchill and Holmstrom [19,20], serious difficulties arise in imposing realistic periodic boundary conditions to solve the one-electron eigenvalue equation; under the boundary conditions commonly used in treating the zero-field case (e.g., Born-Khan boundary conditions), this equation either leads to physically inconsistent results or, still worse, has no solution at all. This difficulty is a consequence of the pathological nature of the perturbing term, -F * r. On an other hand the periodic character of the perturbation is not guaranteed under the nonperiodic linear external perturbation, which would rule out the use of field-perturbed Bloch orbitals.…”
Section: The Difficulty Of Computing Polarizabilities Of Infinite Polmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, as shown by Churchill and Holmstrom [19,20], serious difficulties arise in imposing realistic periodic boundary conditions to solve the one-electron eigenvalue equation; under the boundary conditions commonly used in treating the zero-field case (e.g., Born-Khan boundary conditions), this equation either leads to physically inconsistent results or, still worse, has no solution at all. This difficulty is a consequence of the pathological nature of the perturbing term, -F * r. On an other hand the periodic character of the perturbation is not guaranteed under the nonperiodic linear external perturbation, which would rule out the use of field-perturbed Bloch orbitals.…”
Section: The Difficulty Of Computing Polarizabilities Of Infinite Polmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A necessary condition is that the field be sufficiently weak that tunneling across the gap does not occur. 510,511,512,513 The wave number increases in time according to k = eE/h in an electric field E. The time interval between two Bragg reflections is 2π/a k = h/eaE. The oscillatory current thus would have a frequency ∆V e/h, with ∆V = aE the electrostatic potential drop over one unit cell.…”
Section: Magnetotransport Through a One-dimensional Superlatticementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be canceled by the ͱL factor in the density of states as L→ϱ. The DOS under electric field is given by 13,15 N͑E ͒ϭ…”
Section: ͑3͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 is for a large confining box with an infinite potential barrier that does not include a quantum well near the center. However, with the presence of a quantum well near the center ͑as considered in the present case͒, the DOS will be changed by a finite amount ⌬(E), which is independent of the size of the large confining box.…”
Section: ͑3͒mentioning
confidence: 99%