2019
DOI: 10.2196/15974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Brief Biofeedback via a Smartphone App on Stress Recovery: Randomized Experimental Study

Abstract: BackgroundSmartphones are often vilified for negatively influencing well-being and contributing to stress. However, these devices may, in fact, be useful in times of stress and, in particular, aid in stress recovery. Mobile apps that deliver evidence-based techniques for stress reduction, such as heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) training, hold promise as convenient, accessible, and effective stress-reducing tools. Numerous mobile health apps that may potentially aid in stress recovery are available, b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
24
1
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
24
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was congruent with previous studies [34,35]. Moreover, The Kruskal Wallace nonparametric (pre-intervention and post-intervention) and post-hoc tests comparison revealed that there was no significant difference among the BT group, SDBT group and the control group in depressive symptoms, whereas the BT and SDBT groups had greater reduction in depressive symptoms than the control group., which was not consistent with a previous study [17]. Our results suggested that BT and SDBT had a contribution on improving depressive symptoms, compared to the control group, without significant difference.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This result was congruent with previous studies [34,35]. Moreover, The Kruskal Wallace nonparametric (pre-intervention and post-intervention) and post-hoc tests comparison revealed that there was no significant difference among the BT group, SDBT group and the control group in depressive symptoms, whereas the BT and SDBT groups had greater reduction in depressive symptoms than the control group., which was not consistent with a previous study [17]. Our results suggested that BT and SDBT had a contribution on improving depressive symptoms, compared to the control group, without significant difference.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the Kruskal Wallace H test and post-hoc tests comparison also revealed that the SDBT group had significantly lower occupational stress than did the control group. One study showed that resilience-based and relaxation music-based smartphone applications was better than a control group in improving perceived stress in workers [17], and a similar result was also obtained in our study. BT can be provided only in the hospital which was a relatively a stressful place to nurses, and SDBT was usually carried out during nonworking hours when individuals felt relatively less stress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the breathing rate used in this study was based on past literature suggesting 6 breaths per minute as the average rate to achieve RSA [ 54 ]. Our findings also support recent evidence showing that a brief 5-min app-based biofeedback training session was effective in enhancing physiological recovery after laboratory-induced stress, as assessed by levels of salivary alpha-amylase, another commonly used stress biomarker [ 74 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%