2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2011.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of chemical composition on the microstructure and hardness of Al–Cu–Fe alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The microhardness measured by CSM microhardness tester is Hv 810, which is close to the reported values of annealed Al 65 Cu 20 Fe 15 QC (Hv 844) and Al 64 Cu 22.5 Fe 13.5 QC (Hv 804) [36]. Microhardness, together with elastic modulus, is also provided by nanoindentation tests.…”
Section: Microhardness and Young's Modulussupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The microhardness measured by CSM microhardness tester is Hv 810, which is close to the reported values of annealed Al 65 Cu 20 Fe 15 QC (Hv 844) and Al 64 Cu 22.5 Fe 13.5 QC (Hv 804) [36]. Microhardness, together with elastic modulus, is also provided by nanoindentation tests.…”
Section: Microhardness and Young's Modulussupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It was found also that for the same alloy composition the Θ-Al 2 Cu phase could solidify together with the τ -phase instead of the η 2 [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, many of the questions that researchers have proposed in material investigation have to do with which proportion of elements should be mixed in order to obtain materials with the desired mechanical, physical and chemical properties (Suárez et al, 2011;Tiryakioğlu, 2015;Guler et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%