Effect of CICARE Communication Mode on Disease Uncertainty, Self-Nursing Ability, and Quality of Life in Patients with Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract

Objective. To study the effect of CICARE (Connect, Introduce, Communicate, Ask, Respond, Exit) communication mode on disease uncertainty, self-nursing ability, and quality of life in patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods. From January 2021 to December 2021, 102 patients with CAD after PCI were randomly divided into a research group ( n =51) and a control group ( n =51). The former received CICARE communication model nursing intervention, and the latter received routine doctor-patient communication nursing. To study the scores of disease uncertainty scale (MUIS), Frankl treatment compliance scale (Frankl), self-care ability scale (exercise of self-care-a), quality of life scale (WHOQOL-BREF), and Newcastle nursing satisfaction scale (NSNS) before and 1 week after nursing. Results. After one week of nursing, the MUIS score of the research group was lower than that of the control group, and the score of Frankl treatment compliance scale of the research group was higher than that of the control group. After 1 week of nursing, the ESCA score of the research group was higher compared to the control group ( p < 0.05 ), and the WHOQOL-BREF score of the research group was higher compared to the control group ( p < 0.05 ). After one week of nursing, the NSNS score of the research group was higher compared to the control group ( p < 0.05 ). Conclusion. The application value of CICARE communication mode nursing intervention in patients with CAD after PCI is more remarkable, and it is more helpful to reduce patients’ disease uncertainty, enhance treatment compliance, promote patients’ self-nursing ability, and strengthen quality of life and nursing satisfaction.

Effect of CICARE communication nursing model combined with motivational psychological intervention in patients with post-intensive care unit syndrome

“…After study and observation, the experiment patients more willing to speak out their demand and worries. Other studies have found the same thing[ 2 , 19 - 21 ]. CICARE communication is a mode of communication that advocates good communication that attends to the patients feelings of being respected, accepted and valued during the provision of medical services for patients, including connect, introduce, communication, ask, response and exit.…”

“…For example, the application value of CICARE communication mode nursing intervention in patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention has demonstrated notable value. It has shown great potential in reducing disease uncertainty, improving treatment adherence, enhancing patients’ self-care abilities, and promoting both quality of life and nursing satisfaction[ 2 ].…”

Effect of Medication on Ejection Fraction and Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Disease

“…However, two important indicators, ejection fraction and quality of life, are often overlooked in the treatment of heart disease. Ejection fraction is a key parameter reflecting the contractile function of the heart, which is of crucial significance in assessing cardiac function and predicting the prognosis of the disease, whereas quality of life has a direct impact on the patient's daily life and ability to work, and is another important dimension in evaluating the efficacy of treatment [1].…”

Retracted: Effect of CICARE Communication Mode on Disease Uncertainty, Self‐Nursing Ability, and Quality of Life in Patients with Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”