2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2021.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on attention and on-task behavior in schoolchildren: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(159 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children who participate in classroom-based physical activity are also more likely to meet the WHO’s recommendation of 60 min of daily physical activity [ 53 ]. Classroom-based physical activity has also been shown to increase students’ feelings of joy and motivation to learn, as well as classroom behaviour (i.e., time-on-task) and various aspects of academic achievement, with these effects occurring both acutely and over the long-term [ 12 , 16 , 54 , 55 ]. Additionally, qualitative studies of both high school students and high school teachers support an interest and willingness to engage in physical activity in the classroom [ 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: The Benefits Of Classroom-based Physical Activity For Children In Elementary Schools and The Promising Translation To Adolescentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Children who participate in classroom-based physical activity are also more likely to meet the WHO’s recommendation of 60 min of daily physical activity [ 53 ]. Classroom-based physical activity has also been shown to increase students’ feelings of joy and motivation to learn, as well as classroom behaviour (i.e., time-on-task) and various aspects of academic achievement, with these effects occurring both acutely and over the long-term [ 12 , 16 , 54 , 55 ]. Additionally, qualitative studies of both high school students and high school teachers support an interest and willingness to engage in physical activity in the classroom [ 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: The Benefits Of Classroom-based Physical Activity For Children In Elementary Schools and The Promising Translation To Adolescentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the growing rate of sedentary behaviour among children in many parts of the world [ 11 ], and the corresponding consequences for children’s well-being, many researchers and policy makers have turned to classrooms as potential avenues to increase children’s physical activity behaviour. More specifically, a great deal of research has focused on evaluating how integrating physical activity into elementary school classrooms can reduce sedentary behaviour and improve academic achievement and overall well-being among children [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. However, this work has not extended to high school classrooms, despite adolescents constituting one of the most sedentary portions of the population [ 11 ], and ample evidence demonstrating the critical role that physical activity plays in supporting healthy adolescent development [ 10 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of exercises and whether the sessions are acute or chronic impacted the results more than the type of exercise. The results of another systematic review showed positive effects of a 1-h long PA and short duration activities on attention as well as on-task behaviors (Ruhland and Lange, 2021 ). However, when Seiffer et al investigated the efficacy of PA on children with ADHD, they observed that moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) had only a small effect on total ADHD core symptoms (Seiffer et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews and meta-analyses typically face some limitations, such as a small number of studies (Biddle et al, 2019 ; Schuch et al, 2019 ; Andermo et al, 2020 ; Lambez et al, 2020 ; Carter et al, 2021 ; Liang et al, 2021 ), differences in methodologies (Lambez et al, 2020 ; Vysniauske et al, 2020 ; Dhir et al, 2021 ; Seiffer et al, 2021 ), differences between studies in assessing PA and mental health outcomes (Biddle et al, 2019 ; Andermo et al, 2020 ; Liang et al, 2021 ; Ruhland and Lange, 2021 ; Welsch et al, 2021 ), studies with low or moderate quality and high risk of bias (Rodriguez-Ayllon et al, 2019 ; Vysniauske et al, 2020 ; Carter et al, 2021 ; Dhir et al, 2021 ; Seiffer et al, 2021 ; Welsch et al, 2021 ), and non-representative samples (Biddle et al, 2019 ; Rodriguez-Ayllon et al, 2019 ; Vysniauske et al, 2020 ; Bourke et al, 2021 ; Liang et al, 2021 ; Welsch et al, 2021 ). Individual studies have small and non-representative samples (Ahn et al, 2018 ; Bowe et al, 2021 ; Mercurio et al, 2021 ), low quality, no long-term follow-ups, and inadequate consideration of real-world implementation factors for intervention studies (Parker et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classroom PA breaks can range in length from 30 seconds to 30 minutes depending on their purpose (e.g. attentional reset vs accumulation of PA minutes) but are typically reported in the literature as being between 5 and 20 minutes (Ruhland and Lange, 2021). PA breaks boast many physical, mental and cognitive benefits, including decreased sedentary time, increased PA meeting daily recommendations, increased mood, better behaviour, and improved academic and cognitive performance (Daly-Smith et al, 2018; Ruhland and Lange, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%