2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00474-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of clenching level on mandibular displacement in Kennedy Class II partially edentulous patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1B). This may be due to changes in the masticatory force direction, resulting from changes in articular inclination, [26][27][28] or ''tilting'' of the mandible under the maximum bite force, 29 which can potentially occur after bilateral loss of molar support. On the other hand, it should be noted that not all subjects in the ML2 group revealed high maximum bite forces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B). This may be due to changes in the masticatory force direction, resulting from changes in articular inclination, [26][27][28] or ''tilting'' of the mandible under the maximum bite force, 29 which can potentially occur after bilateral loss of molar support. On the other hand, it should be noted that not all subjects in the ML2 group revealed high maximum bite forces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the SDA concept is still considered controversial by many clinicians. It has, for example, been criticized because the loss of molars is associated with reduced masticatory performance and has been reported to lead to mandibular displacement (14) and various changes in the body, which occur at different rates in animals (15, 16). The SDA condition has also been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of changes in the temporomandibular joint (17, 18), TMD, tooth migration, overeruption, and insufficient chewing ability (19–21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The displaceability of TMJs was regarded as that of the cartilage [ 30 ] because it has a far smaller elastic modulus than that of the TMJ disc [ 34 , 35 ]. Therefore, the elastic modulus of the springs corresponding to TMJs was determined based on the thicknesses of the TMJ disc [ 36 ] and articular cartilage [ 35 ], the stress-strain curve of the intervertebral discs [ 30 ], and the displacement of the condyle [ 37 , 38 ] in intercuspal clenching by indirect measurement. Although the material properties of the human body vary on an individual basis, the models used in this study were therefore considered to be appropriate to investigate the distribution of occlusal forces on the teeth, implants, and TMJs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%