2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of connection induced upper body movements on embodiment towards a limb controlled by another during virtual co-embodiment

Abstract: Even if we cannot control them, or when we receive no tactile or proprioceptive feedback from them, limbs attached to our bodies can still provide indirect proprioceptive and haptic stimulations to the body parts they are attached to simply due to the physical connections. In this study we investigated whether such indirect movement and haptic feedbacks from a limb contribute to a feeling of embodiment towards it. To investigate this issue, we developed a ’Joint Avatar’ setup in which two individuals were give… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While changes in skin conductance may be a good measure of body ownership towards objects like separate rubber hands ( Armel & Ramachandran, 2003 ; Tsuji et al, 2013 ), and partner-controlled limbs ( Hapuarachchi & Kitazaki, 2022 ; Wegner et al, 2004 ), it may not be very reliable for measuring full body illusions according to our results due to lack of evidence supporting the subjective ratings for body ownership. Therefore, other measurements such as proprioceptive drifts ( Botvinick & Cohen, 1998 ; Costantini & Haggard, 2007 ; Tsakiris & Haggard, 2005 ; Tosi et al, 2023 ) and changes in body schema and representation ( Bertoni et al, 2023 ; Hapuarachchi et al, 2023 ; Matamala-Gomez et al, 2020 ) following previous work may better suit as alternative objective measurements for body ownership in future experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While changes in skin conductance may be a good measure of body ownership towards objects like separate rubber hands ( Armel & Ramachandran, 2003 ; Tsuji et al, 2013 ), and partner-controlled limbs ( Hapuarachchi & Kitazaki, 2022 ; Wegner et al, 2004 ), it may not be very reliable for measuring full body illusions according to our results due to lack of evidence supporting the subjective ratings for body ownership. Therefore, other measurements such as proprioceptive drifts ( Botvinick & Cohen, 1998 ; Costantini & Haggard, 2007 ; Tsakiris & Haggard, 2005 ; Tosi et al, 2023 ) and changes in body schema and representation ( Bertoni et al, 2023 ; Hapuarachchi et al, 2023 ; Matamala-Gomez et al, 2020 ) following previous work may better suit as alternative objective measurements for body ownership in future experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such virtual embodiments are based on the concept that one person has one body. However, virtual co-embodiment [20] [21] [22] and virtual multibody embodiment [23][24] [25] have further expanded the perspective of human embodiment as augmented humans [26] [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%