2010
DOI: 10.1134/s0362119710050038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of context on the plasticity of cognitive activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 show that at the set formation stage (when all subjects correctly recognized the difference in the emotional facial expressions in all 15 trials), a desynchronization reaction was seen during the first second after presentation of the target stimulus (S1), this affecting both the low-frequency and high-frequency components of the α rhythm to the same extents, in the "no errors" group of subjects and in groups with larger numbers of errors. This reaction was weaker in subjects with relatively small numbers of errors (1)(2)(3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 show that at the set formation stage (when all subjects correctly recognized the difference in the emotional facial expressions in all 15 trials), a desynchronization reaction was seen during the first second after presentation of the target stimulus (S1), this affecting both the low-frequency and high-frequency components of the α rhythm to the same extents, in the "no errors" group of subjects and in groups with larger numbers of errors. This reaction was weaker in subjects with relatively small numbers of errors (1)(2)(3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In all these experiments, the loading on working memory consisted only of an increase in the time interval during which the subject had to retain the result of the comparative evaluation of the emotional expressions of two faces in memory and press a button and provide a verbal report of their decision in response to the trigger stimulus. This loading on working memory affects the ability to switch sets to a significantly lesser extent than in the situation in which loading consisted of an additional cognitive task introduced to the interstimulus interval [1]. In our view, synchronization of the α rhythm during the interstimulus period has significant functional importance when the interstimulus interval is lengthened.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The presence of some power increase of α3-waves in the frontal area (r ≤ 0.05) in men with a low IαF can display the additional braking mechanisms of the sensory input [29,32] and can be the EEG-correlator of the matching process of the afferent information flows as to the new parameters of the muscle activity with the downgoing effects of the frontal cortex on the previous motor program. Such descending inhibi- tory influences generally prevent the motor programming [1] in the course of manual movements performed by the subdominant hand and, according to Kostandov [32], they show some less flexibility of commands. The reduction of the capacity in the cortex at frequency of the EEG θ-, α1-, α2-, β1-oscillations (with p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01) was specified both in men with a high IαF and in men with a low α-frequency.…”
Section: Features Of the Cortical Activity While Performing The Fingementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that this process involves local and distributed neuronal net works encompassing projection cortical fields, the extrastriate cortex, the prefrontal cortex, and limbic structures of the brain [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. It follows that the pos sibility of recognizing objects of different complexities is determined by the extent and pattern of involvement of modal specific structures in the analysis and pro cessing of visual information and regulatory systems modulating the functional activity of various cortical zones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows that the pos sibility of recognizing objects of different complexities is determined by the extent and pattern of involvement of modal specific structures in the analysis and pro cessing of visual information and regulatory systems modulating the functional activity of various cortical zones. The most important role in cognitive processes, including visual recognition, belongs to the prefrontal cortex and its executive directional impacts on the activity of cortical regions involved in the performance of cognitive tasks [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%