2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of culture environment on gene expression and developmental characteristics in IVF-derived embryos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
125
1
14

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
125
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the drawbacks to using serum include variability in composition between batches, its undefined nature and the risk of contamination. In addition, the presence of serum during culture alters gene expression and tolerance to cryopreservation, when compared to in vivo embryos [for review see Lonergan et al 2006). Similar results are found in mice (Khosla et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the drawbacks to using serum include variability in composition between batches, its undefined nature and the risk of contamination. In addition, the presence of serum during culture alters gene expression and tolerance to cryopreservation, when compared to in vivo embryos [for review see Lonergan et al 2006). Similar results are found in mice (Khosla et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Warming and survival cultures were made in three batches. Different superscripts within columns differ significantly ( a,b P < 0.03; c,d,e P < 0.05; f ,g,h P < 0.02) 6.0 ± 6.9 e 5.9 ± 7.1 h a review, see Lonergan et al 2006;Lonergan 2007;Lonergan and Fair 2008). In the present study, ATRA increased the development of Day 8 blastocysts compared with LG treatment and control, although significant differences between ATRA and LG treatment groups were already evident on Day 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development potential of embryos obtained in vitro is lower in comparison with embryos obtained in vivo due to suboptimal conditions during oocyte maturation, their subsequent fertilization, and embryonic development (Wright and Ellington, 1995;Young et al, 1998;Lonergan et al, 2006;Metwally and Ledger, 2011).…”
Section: Development Potential Of Embryos Obtained In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%