2006
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2006.1726.1731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of De-Awning on Physical Properties of Paddy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relationship between TKW and independent variable are presented in Table 3. Similar trend of decreasing TKW has been reported for neem nuts (Visvanathan et al, 1996), hackberry (Demir et al, 2002), hemp seed (Sacilik et al, 2003), paddy (Alizadeh et al, 2006) and paddy and white rice (Gharekhani et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relationship between TKW and independent variable are presented in Table 3. Similar trend of decreasing TKW has been reported for neem nuts (Visvanathan et al, 1996), hackberry (Demir et al, 2002), hemp seed (Sacilik et al, 2003), paddy (Alizadeh et al, 2006) and paddy and white rice (Gharekhani et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Models appropriateness was also indicated by non-significance of lack of fit (Table 3). Similar results obtaining a decreasing trend with respect to temperature has also been reported for pomegranate seeds (Kingsly et al, 2006), paddy (Alizadeh et al, 2006), barley seeds (Aghajani et al, 2012) and Chironji (Buchanania lanzan) Nut (Kumar et al, 2016). Thousand kernel weight (TKW) TKW when analyzed at different runs was found to be statistically different (p≤0.05).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All impurities in the samples were removed by hand. Afterwards, samples were placed in an electrical oven with 43°C (Alizadeh et al, 2006) to be dried up to 9% (w.b.). Dried rough rice samples were then husked by a laboratory rubber roll husker (THU35B, Satake Corp., Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nazni and Bhuvaneswari [20] reported the values of thousand kernel weight 2.46±0.005g, which is on the higher side where as the value of bulk density reported as 0.70±0.01g/ml which is pretty closer to the present result. The slight variations might be due to the agro-climatic variations coupled with harvesting maturity.The low bulk density in oats could be attributed to elongated spindle shape that occupies space by maintain distance between the grains resulting in reduction of total mass per unit volume [21]. The porosity value attained as 43.27, 20.12, 30.20 and 46.94 g/100 g for Oat, Pearl millet, Sorghum and Finger millet respectively.…”
Section: Physical Parameters Of Selected Cereal Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%