1989
DOI: 10.1177/002199838902301201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Delamination on the Natural Frequencies of Composite Laminates

Abstract: This paper presents the results of a study on the effect of prescribed delamination on the natural frequencies of laminated beam specimens. Experimental modal analysis was used to measure the effect of delamination length on the first four frequencies of the simply supported test specimens. The experimental results were corroborated with detailed finite element models as well as with simplified beam theory models. The presence of a delamination degraded the even numbered vibration modes much more rapidly than … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Della and Shu [2005] extended the model of [Mujumdar and Suryanarayan 1988] to composite beams, by using the effective bending stiffness terms of composite laminates. In what could be termed a similar approach, Pardoen [1989] developed a constrained model to predict the natural frequencies of a simply supported composite beam considering only midplane delaminations. In this analytical study, the model first adopted by [Ramkumar and Kulkarni 1979] is customized for composite laminates, to determine the changes in natural frequencies due to delaminations located at different interfaces.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Della and Shu [2005] extended the model of [Mujumdar and Suryanarayan 1988] to composite beams, by using the effective bending stiffness terms of composite laminates. In what could be termed a similar approach, Pardoen [1989] developed a constrained model to predict the natural frequencies of a simply supported composite beam considering only midplane delaminations. In this analytical study, the model first adopted by [Ramkumar and Kulkarni 1979] is customized for composite laminates, to determine the changes in natural frequencies due to delaminations located at different interfaces.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibration-based SHM (VSHM) methods present a very attractive possibility since they are global non-destructive methods and do not require any a priori information for the damage location, type or size. There exists a number of VSHM methods that have been developed, some of which are based on the modal parameters of a structure, including its natural frequencies [2] and/or mode shapes [3], others use its Frequency Response Functions (FRFs) and/or its time or frequency domain vibration response [4]. In general VSHM methods can be divided into two big categories: model-based and non-model based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some studies that target model-based VSHM methods as applied to composite structures but it should be stressed that these are developed for specific applications in the sense of material and structures and they are generally not applicable to other cases. FEM has been used by several authors for the purposes of modelling the response of structures made of laminates, especially beams and a few of them are focused on plates [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. A number of works can be found dealing with modelling the vibratory response of delaminated composite laminate structures [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response to dynamic loading shows significant changes in responses compared to the deterministic value. The presence of damage causes stiffness reduction, which causes a shift in the natural frequencies, especially at high frequencies [Pardoen 1989]. Variation in the material properties also shifts the natural frequencies and the modal amplitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%