2007
DOI: 10.1093/ietcom/e90-b.1.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Delay of Feedback Force on Perception of Elastic Force: A Psychophysical Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A general hypothesis supported by past work [11][12][13] is that time delays in position feedforward and haptic feedback can disturb the human operator and cause misjudgements. The key question we pose in this paper is how is the user performance of this basic manipulation task influenced by delays in haptic feedback?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A general hypothesis supported by past work [11][12][13] is that time delays in position feedforward and haptic feedback can disturb the human operator and cause misjudgements. The key question we pose in this paper is how is the user performance of this basic manipulation task influenced by delays in haptic feedback?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjected to a forced-choice paradigm (i.e., distinguish the stiffer of two surfaces or identify them as having the same stiffness), users perceived the surfaces to be stiffer than actual under delayed force feedback and the stiffness overestimation increased for larger delays [11,12]. Recently, the effect of crossing the boundary of a force field, where local stiffness is ill-defined, on the perception of delayed stiffness has been studied [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the method, stimuli are presented numerous times in random order. Ohnishi and Mochizuki [101] use the method to measure the difference threshold (DL), which is the smallest change in stimulation that a person can detect, and Weber fraction, which is the fraction given by the difference threshold divided by the standard intensity, and so on for the perception of elastic force generated by a haptic interface device.…”
Section: (5) Constant Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As subjective assessment methods, there are the rating scale method [98], SD (Semantic Differential) method [99], method of successive categories [100], pair comparison method [98], constant method [101], questionnaire survey [97], and so on.…”
Section: Subjective Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjected to a forced-choice paradigm (i.e., distinguish the stiffer of the two surfaces or identify them as having the same stiffness), users perceived the surfaces to be stiffer than actual under delayed force feedback and the stiffness overestimation increased for larger delays [12,13]. Recently, the effect of crossing the boundary of a force field, where local stiffness is ill-defined, on the perception of delayed stiffness has been studied [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%