2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of depth information on multiple-object tracking in three dimensions: A probabilistic perspective

Abstract: Many daily situations require us to track multiple objects and people. This ability has traditionally been investigated in observers tracking objects in a plane. This simplification of reality does not address how observers track objects when targets move in three dimensions. Here, we study how observers track multiple objects in 2D and 3D while manipulating the average speed of the objects and the average distance between them. We show that performance declines as speed increases and distance decreases and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This expectation is based on the results reported in an abstract to a vision conference (Tinjust et al, 2010). Other MOT studies, however, show the opposite effect: Tracking objects on different depth planesas in 3Dhas been found to be easier than tracking objects on one depth planeas in 2D (see Cooke et al, 2017;Dünser & Mancero, 2009;Viswanathan & Mingolla, 2002). Similar to 2D MOT, tracking accuracy is impaired in 3D when object speed is increased or when distances between objects are reduced (Cooke et al, 2017;Ur Rehman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Selective Attentionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This expectation is based on the results reported in an abstract to a vision conference (Tinjust et al, 2010). Other MOT studies, however, show the opposite effect: Tracking objects on different depth planesas in 3Dhas been found to be easier than tracking objects on one depth planeas in 2D (see Cooke et al, 2017;Dünser & Mancero, 2009;Viswanathan & Mingolla, 2002). Similar to 2D MOT, tracking accuracy is impaired in 3D when object speed is increased or when distances between objects are reduced (Cooke et al, 2017;Ur Rehman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Selective Attentionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other MOT studies, however, show the opposite effect: Tracking objects on different depth planesas in 3Dhas been found to be easier than tracking objects on one depth planeas in 2D (see Cooke et al, 2017;Dünser & Mancero, 2009;Viswanathan & Mingolla, 2002). Similar to 2D MOT, tracking accuracy is impaired in 3D when object speed is increased or when distances between objects are reduced (Cooke et al, 2017;Ur Rehman et al, 2015). Sustained attention involves parallel and serial tracking processes that are sensitive to the number and speed of objects, the distance between objects as well as their location in the visual 3D environment.…”
Section: Selective Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracking performance declines with increasing speed and decreasing distance between objects. Overall tracking accuracy is always higher in 3D compared to 2D [68]. According to [69], more attention is allocated when targets are in a crowded situation and have a higher chance of being lost.…”
Section: Main Topics In Mttmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using virtual reality (VR) seems to be an appropriate solution to overcome this viewing limitation ( McGuckian et al, 2018 ; Rojas-Ferrer et al, 2020 ). VR devices display a computer-generated immersive virtual environment in stereoscopy, which allows an observer to access depth cues that have been relevant for tracking multiple objects ( Cooke et al, 2017 ). In addition, the adaptive first person viewpoint enhances the sense of presence in the environment, i.e., the feeling of actually belonging to the virtual world ( Loomis et al, 1999 ; Slater and Sanchez-Vives, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%