1938
DOI: 10.1038/142435b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Desoxycorticosterone and its Esters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1939
1939
1969
1969

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulty in the case of deoxycorticosterone acetate ('DCA'), however, was that this substance by itself produces a progestational reaction in the rabbit in doses of 5-10 mg., which are only 5-10 times greater than the required amount of progesterone [Miescher, Fischer & Tschopp, 1938;Robson, 1939]. Conversion of DCA to pro¬ gesterone could thus be demonstrated biologically only if the percentage conversion was of a high order, giving rise to marked increase in progestational effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The difficulty in the case of deoxycorticosterone acetate ('DCA'), however, was that this substance by itself produces a progestational reaction in the rabbit in doses of 5-10 mg., which are only 5-10 times greater than the required amount of progesterone [Miescher, Fischer & Tschopp, 1938;Robson, 1939]. Conversion of DCA to pro¬ gesterone could thus be demonstrated biologically only if the percentage conversion was of a high order, giving rise to marked increase in progestational effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These findings were taken to mean that the two hormones were inactivated during transport through the liver via the portal circula¬ tion, but the experiment did not exclude the possibility that the spleen itself played some role in the inactivation. Methyltestosterone, however, first shown to be a potent androgen in 1935 by Ruzicka, Goldberg & Rosenberg, is unequivocally more potent than any other androgen when administered orally to castrated rats [Miescher & Tschopp, 1938], and it has been claimed that the presence of the methyl group in the 17 position protected this androgen from destruction in the stomach and intestine. Biskind [1940] concluded that its activity when given by mouth was due to absorption via the lymphatics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The disadvantage of these preparations is that they are largely inactive when taken by mouth, owing to their destruction by the liver. An advance in treatment followed the production of methyltestosterone, which, when given orally, was shown to be active in castrated rats (Miescher and Tschopp, 1938), and later its potency was confirmed in man. Taken in this way, only about one-third is destroyed by-the liver, but this is sufficient to make oral therapy expensive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%