1985
DOI: 10.2527/jas1985.6151164x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Dietary Energy Intake during Lactation on Performance of Primiparous Sows and their Litters

Abstract: A total of 146 primiparous sows was used in four replications of an experiment to investigate the effect of energy intake during a 28-d lactation on sow and litter performance. Dietary treatments consisted of three energy intakes; 10, 12 or 14 Meal of metabolizable energy (ME) 9 sow-1. d -t. All sows were fed equal amounts of crude protein, vitamins and minerals daily, which met or exceeded standard recommendations. The experiment was initiated at parturition. Sow weight and backfat loss during lactation decre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
2
3

Year Published

1987
1987
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
15
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, almost all of the additional nutrients available to the sows were directed toward tissue anabolism (see Clowes et al, 1998 for further discussion) and could have potentially ameliorated any inhibitory effects of lactational catabolism on reproductive performance. Consistent with the data reported by Nelssen et al (1985), Mullan and Williams (1989), and Koketsu et al (1996), restriction of feed intake during lactation seemed to decrease litter weight at weaning and extended the weaning-to-estrus interval (Reese et al, 1982;Mullan and Williams, 1989). Despite the increase in body weight and backfat during lactation, the fertility of SA sows was not different from that of Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Hence, almost all of the additional nutrients available to the sows were directed toward tissue anabolism (see Clowes et al, 1998 for further discussion) and could have potentially ameliorated any inhibitory effects of lactational catabolism on reproductive performance. Consistent with the data reported by Nelssen et al (1985), Mullan and Williams (1989), and Koketsu et al (1996), restriction of feed intake during lactation seemed to decrease litter weight at weaning and extended the weaning-to-estrus interval (Reese et al, 1982;Mullan and Williams, 1989). Despite the increase in body weight and backfat during lactation, the fertility of SA sows was not different from that of Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The data of the present experiment agree with previously reported effects of energy restriction (Adam and Shearer, 1975;Reese et al, 1982a,b;Nelssen et al, 1985), and of protein restriction (Mahan and Mangan, 1975;Greenhalgh et al, 1977;NCR-42, 1978) during lactation on sow performance. King and Williams (1984b) found weight changes during lactation (average length 32 d) to be --35.8, -32.5, -29.8 and -3.9 kg for LE-LP, HE-LP, LE-HP and HE-HP treatments, respectively, whereas the corresponding sow weight changes in our experiment were -26.1, -18.0, -20.0 and -3.7 kg.…”
Section: Expsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Sows that were fed HP had higher (P = .037) concentrations of serum urea than sows fed LP at the time of return to estrus, but energy had no effect on urea concentration. Reese et al (1982a,b) and Nelssen et al (1985) used serum urea as an index to determine the extent of amino acid catabolism, with the assumption that concentration of serum urea is positively correlated with amino acid catabolism. The data reported herein indicate that amino acid catabolism was greater in sows fed HP than LP, and also was greater in sows fed LE than HE.…”
Section: '8mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Redução na perda de peso da porca durante a lactação em razão do aumento no consumo de energia digestível foi observada por Nelssen et al (1985), ao avaliarem um aumento do consumo de energia digestível de 10.000kcal de ED/dia a 14.000kcal de ED/dia, e por Armstrong et al (1986), que constataram terem perdido 7,8kg as porcas que se alimentaram à vontade (12.190kcal de EM/dia), enquanto aquelas submetidas à restrição energética (8.140kcal de EM/dia) perderam mais peso (14,3kg) durante os 21 dias de lactação.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified