2010
DOI: 10.1149/1.3377090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Deposition Mediums on the Adhesion and Removal of Particles

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the different deposition mediums on the adhesion and removal of particles. Polystyrene latex ͑PSL͒ particles ͑50 m͒ are deposited on thermal oxide and silicon nitride coated silicon wafers using different suspension mediums: air, isopropyl alcohol ͑IPA͒, and deionized water and then removed in a dry environment. The results show that PSL particles deposited on oxide are easier to remove than those on nitride due to a higher van der Waals force in all de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, RICM experiments reveal topologically complex local deformations and contact phenomena relevant to virtually all adhesion models. The finding of various scenarios at the micro scale after dry/wet deposition of PSL particles on a glass substrate is in qualitative agreement with recent results that show how different deposition media affect the particle removal efficiency, a fact attributed to plastic deformation of particles caused by capillary forces43. Even more significant is the direct observation of femtolitre-scale capillary condensation dynamics underneath micron-sized particles, believed to be unique, given that capillary condensation have only been directly observed using environmental SEM4445 and studied with the surface forces apparatus4647, although employing two crossed cylindrical mica surfaces with very large radii of curvature (~1–2 cm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, RICM experiments reveal topologically complex local deformations and contact phenomena relevant to virtually all adhesion models. The finding of various scenarios at the micro scale after dry/wet deposition of PSL particles on a glass substrate is in qualitative agreement with recent results that show how different deposition media affect the particle removal efficiency, a fact attributed to plastic deformation of particles caused by capillary forces43. Even more significant is the direct observation of femtolitre-scale capillary condensation dynamics underneath micron-sized particles, believed to be unique, given that capillary condensation have only been directly observed using environmental SEM4445 and studied with the surface forces apparatus4647, although employing two crossed cylindrical mica surfaces with very large radii of curvature (~1–2 cm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The charge accumulated in the substrate during irradiation by the beam was estimated using the expressions presented in [ 41 ] and amounted to 0.7 pC for the scanning area of the beam with an area of 100 μm 2 . The van der Waals forces between the particle and the substrate and between the tip and the particle were calculated using the expressions from [ 42 , 43 ]. In this case, a Hamaker constant of 26.8 × 10 −20 J for the particle–substrate interface and 45.2 × 10 −20 J for the tip–particle interface were used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, van der Waals forces holding the particle on the substrate will also be significantly higher for BTO particles. Secondly, the method of the particle deposition on a substrate can be crucial for the magnitude of the adhesion force [ 43 ]. For example, the precipitation of particles from a liquid suspension by droplet formation and subsequent drying can lead to condensation of impurities in the contact area [ 44 ], which also leads to an increase in adhesion forces to the substrate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the particle to the surface even after the water evaporates, thus increasing the adhesion force and making the particle more difficult to remove. 15 In Fig. 3, paired trials 1 to 3 were textured vinyl surfaces for dry, sebum, and water droplet deposition methods, respectively.…”
Section: Particle Collection Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%