2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1ay05299c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of adhesive coated swabs for improved swipe-based particle collection efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wipes were reused 10, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 times by swiping over each surface in a single direction with a distance of 10 cm and an average force of 7 N. Wipes were then carefully removed from the swiping mount. Particle collection efficiencies (PCE) were later measured by counting 39 μm diameter fluorescent polymer microspheres dry deposited on vinyl surfaces before swipe sampling and comparing that to the number of the particles collected on the wipe after swipe sampling, as discussed in detail in other work [ 16 , 22 ]. Briefly, PCE was calculated by dividing the number of particles collected on the wipe by the number of particles that were originally on the vinyl surface, and multiplying that number by 100 to calculate a percent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wipes were reused 10, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 times by swiping over each surface in a single direction with a distance of 10 cm and an average force of 7 N. Wipes were then carefully removed from the swiping mount. Particle collection efficiencies (PCE) were later measured by counting 39 μm diameter fluorescent polymer microspheres dry deposited on vinyl surfaces before swipe sampling and comparing that to the number of the particles collected on the wipe after swipe sampling, as discussed in detail in other work [ 16 , 22 ]. Briefly, PCE was calculated by dividing the number of particles collected on the wipe by the number of particles that were originally on the vinyl surface, and multiplying that number by 100 to calculate a percent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Although IMS has been heavily studied in both academic and industrial circles, it is limited by the collection of particles onto the swabs or particle traps. 7 That is, trace residues of explosives or other contraband materials cannot be detected accurately without a reliable system to first remove the particles from the surface of interest, rendering particle collection the critical step in the detection process. Unfortunately, existing commercial swabs used for trace explosive detection [e.g., muslin cloth and poly(tetrafluoro ethylene)-coated (PTFE-coated) fiberglass] have been shown to provide vastly different particle collection efficiencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fast response time and high sensitivity of the IMS causes this method to be efficient for the detection of trace explosive residues . Although IMS has been heavily studied in both academic and industrial circles, it is limited by the collection of particles onto the swabs or particle traps . That is, trace residues of explosives or other contraband materials cannot be detected accurately without a reliable system to first remove the particles from the surface of interest, rendering particle collection the critical step in the detection process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Their study targeted the harvesting of explosives residues as opposed to the contrabands studied here. Staymates’ recommended silicone coating was one of the polymer coatings investigated along with a sol–gel polymer that was described previously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%