2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different design of abutment and implant on stress distribution in 2 implants and peripheral bone: A finite element analysis study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard dental implants have a cylindrical geometry with a helical screw track and a single root structure. 50 However, because of the poor machinability of the NiTi alloy 51,52 and the lack of a significant effect on the targeted SME, the implant model was prepared without screw traces. As seen in Figure 2, towing to the hollow structure created, both artificial tooth roots were obtained, and the bone− implant contact surface area was increased.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Standard dental implants have a cylindrical geometry with a helical screw track and a single root structure. 50 However, because of the poor machinability of the NiTi alloy 51,52 and the lack of a significant effect on the targeted SME, the implant model was prepared without screw traces. As seen in Figure 2, towing to the hollow structure created, both artificial tooth roots were obtained, and the bone− implant contact surface area was increased.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implant root must have two or more roots for the self-fitting effect and SME of the implant model produced from the NiTi alloy. Standard dental implants have a cylindrical geometry with a helical screw track and a single root structure . However, because of the poor machinability of the NiTi alloy , and the lack of a significant effect on the targeted SME, the implant model was prepared without screw traces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress analysis calculated by FE method showed an excellent distribution of bone around implant while any forces applied. Some articles provided stress distribution any type of implant [ 16 , 17 , 18 ]. If it were possible to perform virtual implant therapy simulations using 3D X-ray CT scans of live individuals prior to the actual procedure, treatment planning for implants could be carried out with a high level of mechanical predictability, which could become a new diagnostic standard in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there is no clear result in the literature, studies on abutment design and material are needed. Finite element analysis (FEA) can be used to evaluate stress‐related outcomes to model clinical conditions and assess biomechanics in implant dentistry 20–23 . The purpose of this 3D FEA study is to analyze the stress distributions on the implant and its components with abutments produced with different angles, properties and materials, and strain distribution on the simulated bone where the implant is placed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element analysis (FEA) can be used to evaluate stress-related outcomes to model clinical conditions and assess biomechanics in implant dentistry. [20][21][22][23] The purpose of this 3D FEA study is to analyze the stress distributions on the implant and its components with abutments produced with different angles, properties and materials, and strain distribution on the simulated bone where the implant is placed. The first null hypothesis was that the type, angle, and material properties of the abutment would not affect the stress on the implant components and the strain on the simulated bones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%