“…Indeed, 19 years ago, Robinson et al found that even in horses with historical severe EA, clinical score failed to reflect low-grade airway obstruction, and suggested that without easily used, field-accessible testing equipment, lower airway disease would go underdiagnosed ( 53 ). Recently, the adapted 23-point scoring system has been shown to be the most useful in discriminating mild from severe cases, but it is unlikely to distinguish normal from subclinical disease ( 54 ), and the IDEASS scoring system has recently been described as a useful scoring system for moderate-to-severe equine asthma ( 55 ). Thus, while clinical scoring is essential to a good examination and careful research, and can potentially be useful in measuring response to treatment in the individual, it is insufficient in making the phenotypic distinction between mildly affected horses and healthy horses.…”