2016
DOI: 10.5958/2277-3371.2016.00010.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different extenders on the quality of boar semen during preservation at 15°C and 5°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean percentage of HOST-reacted sperm was significantly higher (P<0.05) in TRIXcell+ as compared to Modena and GEPS extenders at all hours of preservation. The present observations were in close proximity with the reports of previous researchers (Saikia et al 2016). However, Lalrintluanga et al (2016) reported lower mean percentage of HOST-reacted sperm than obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean percentage of HOST-reacted sperm was significantly higher (P<0.05) in TRIXcell+ as compared to Modena and GEPS extenders at all hours of preservation. The present observations were in close proximity with the reports of previous researchers (Saikia et al 2016). However, Lalrintluanga et al (2016) reported lower mean percentage of HOST-reacted sperm than obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The mean percentage of sperm motility at each hour of preservation in Modena was significantly higher (P<0.05) than GEPS extender. Similar findings were also obtained by Bania (2017), van den Berg et al (2014) and Saikia et al (2016) who recorded significantly lower sperm motility in TRIXcell+, Modena and GEPS extenders. The significantly higher sperm motility in TRIXcell+ extender is unknown as its composition is a commercial secret.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%