2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different extraction agents on metal and organic contaminant removal from a field soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the authors observed that the presence of surfactants tended to reduce the electric conductivity of the soil and the electro-osmotic low compared with the stages where citric acid was used as lushing solution. The results conirmed previous studies, in which the ability of surfactants, cosolvents, cyclodextrins, chelating agents and organic acids to remove Ni and phenanthrene from kaolin soil was tested [52,53]. EDT" was conirmed to produce complications during electrokinetic experiments [54].…”
Section: Electrokinetic Processessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, the authors observed that the presence of surfactants tended to reduce the electric conductivity of the soil and the electro-osmotic low compared with the stages where citric acid was used as lushing solution. The results conirmed previous studies, in which the ability of surfactants, cosolvents, cyclodextrins, chelating agents and organic acids to remove Ni and phenanthrene from kaolin soil was tested [52,53]. EDT" was conirmed to produce complications during electrokinetic experiments [54].…”
Section: Electrokinetic Processessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The above spiking was intended to furnish about 500 mg/kg as target concentration. The parent and amended soils were characterized in terms of physicochemical properties -pH, textural analysis, soil organic matter, OM; cation exchange capacity and CEC (USEPA, 1995) and pseudototal Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb content (Khodadoust et al, 2005).…”
Section: Soil Sampling Spiking and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Batch extractions of heavy metal contaminants using a common extractant concentration of 0.05M were conducted according to the procedure reported by Khodadoust et al (2005) with slight modifications using a soil:water ratio of 1:25 (i.e. 1 g of the soil with 25 mL of extracting solution).…”
Section: Soil Washing Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concern of the pollution caused by heavy metal-containing sludge has accentuated the need to carry out numerous investigations as well as to develop various methods/techniques to remove the toxic heavy metals from contaminated sites. Some of the popular methods include ion exchange (Parkpian et al 2002), Phyto-remediation (Neugschwandtner et al 2008) and chemistry (Sanchez-Martin et al 2007;Khodadoust et al 2005;Ito et al 2000, Naoum et al 2001Marchioretto et al 2002). Moreover soils are effective agents of heavy metal sorption, particularly soils with high contents of organic matter, clays and Fe, Al, Mn oxides and hydroxides (Tessier et al 1995;Gong and Donahoe 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%