Effect of different methods of cutting fluid application on turning of a difficult-to-machine steel (SAE EV-8)

Abstract

In this study, different methods of cutting fluid application are used in turning of a difficult-to-machine steel (SAE EV-8). Initially, a semisynthetic cutting fluid was applied using a conventional method (i.e. overhead flood cooling), minimum quantity of cutting fluid, and pulverization. A lubricant of vegetable oil (minimum quantity of lubricant) was also applied using the minimum quantity method. Thereafter, a cutting fluid jet under high pressure (3.0 MPa) was singly applied in the following regions: chip–tool interface, top surface of the chip (between workpiece and chip) and tool–workpiece contact. Moreover, two other methods were used: an interflow between conventional application and chip–tool interface jet (combined method) and, finally, three jets simultaneously applied. In order to carry out these tests, it was necessary to set up a high-pressure system using a piston pump for generating a cutting fluid jet, a venturi for fluid application (minimum quantity of cutting fluid and minimum quantity of lubricant) and a nozzle for cutting fluid pulverization. The output variables analyzed included tool life, surface roughness, cutting tool temperature, cutting force, chip form, chip compression rate and machined specimen microstructure. Among the results, it can be observed that the tool life increases and the cutting force decreases with the application of cutting fluid jet, mainly when it is directed to the chip–tool interface. Excluding the methods involving jet fluid, the conventional method seems to be more efficient than other methods of low pressure, such as minimum quantity of volume and pulverization, when considering just the cutting tool wear.

Turning SKD 11 Hardened Steel: An Experimental Study of Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate Using Taguchi Method

“…Te analysis revealed a discrepancy of 3.37% between the observed values, with the predictive value for material removal rate estimated at 15.26 cm 3 /min. Tis range of deviation is well validated by multiple previous investigations conducted by researchers on a close to similar cutting environment [26,69].…”

“…Te lack of lubricant/ coolant during high-speed turning of heat-treated steel results in a chip disposal issue. Tis issue leads to increased friction at the tool-chip and tool-work interfaces, thus causing faster attrition and tool wear [26]. While a plentiful supply of coolant proved benefcial in reducing friction, it also resulted in increased machining costs and gave rise to certain adverse health efects for individuals [27,28].…”

Effects of cutting fluid with different pressures and jetting paths on machined surface integrity in cutting compacted graphite iron: An experimental study

“…So, as compared with ordinary pouring fluid, high-pressure cutting fluid has better cooling, lubrication, and cleaning effects in metal machining. 13–15 In this study, cutting fluids with different pressures (0–6 MPa) are used in the machining of CGI with different cutting speeds. The cutting fluid is directly injected into the cutting zone along the flank and rake face of the cutting tool.…”