2016
DOI: 10.1515/agri-2016-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Plant Arrangements on Maize Morphology and Forage Quality

Abstract: A study was carried out in Central Bohemia to understand the effect of row spacing and stand density on plant morphology, productivity and quality of silage maize in two row spacing treatments (0.70 m and 0.35 m) at two stand densities (92,000 plants/ha and 110,000 plants/ha). The results of the study showed that row spacing and stand density had no effect on plant height or weight; however, significantly higher ear ratio and dry matter content was found in narrow rows at 110,000 plants/ha. It was observed tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In arrangement A3, with significant differences (P≤0.05), Chena's height (64.5 cm) was lower than the height of the same variety in arrangements A1 (70.6 cm) and A2 (69.9 cm), which were combinations of Chena and Moreliana or Flamingo (Table 2). Spatial arrangements usually vary in population density because of the distance between rows and plants, a fact that influences not only the yield components but also the products' quality (Jirmanová et al, 2016;Coelho et al, 2016). However, in this study, the sowing density was the same in the three arrangements, which suggests that due to possible variations in nutrient demands (Valdez-Aguilar et al, 2015) caused by the strategic distribution of the cultivars, Chena plants were taller in A1 and A2 compared with those in A3.…”
Section: Plant Heightcontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In arrangement A3, with significant differences (P≤0.05), Chena's height (64.5 cm) was lower than the height of the same variety in arrangements A1 (70.6 cm) and A2 (69.9 cm), which were combinations of Chena and Moreliana or Flamingo (Table 2). Spatial arrangements usually vary in population density because of the distance between rows and plants, a fact that influences not only the yield components but also the products' quality (Jirmanová et al, 2016;Coelho et al, 2016). However, in this study, the sowing density was the same in the three arrangements, which suggests that due to possible variations in nutrient demands (Valdez-Aguilar et al, 2015) caused by the strategic distribution of the cultivars, Chena plants were taller in A1 and A2 compared with those in A3.…”
Section: Plant Heightcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…En este sentido, el arreglo espacial, o distribución de las plantas de manera estratégica, puede ser una oportunidad para evitar la presencia de patógenos (Potts, 1990;Storkey et al, 2018). Diferentes estudios mencionan que el arreglo o disposición física de plantas es una estrategia para controlar la presencia de maleza (Evers y Bastiaans, 2016), mejorar la producción (Boyd et al, 2009) y la calidad de cultivos (De Souza-Schlick et al, 2014), así como afectar la morfología y calidad de la planta (Jirmanová et al, 2016). Investigaciones recientes sobre los compuestos orgánicos volátiles (β-farneseno, linalool, β-pineno, β-cariofileno, entre otros) generados por cultivares de crisantemo infectados por B. cinerea, proponen la planificación del arreglo de los cultivares en el invernadero como un factor a considerar ya que un cultivar que libera este tipo de compuestos podría ser la protección de otro cultivar diferente (Piesik et al, 2015).…”
Section: Fully Bilingualunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tinggi tanaman merupakan komponen penting dalam pertumbuhan karena untuk mengetahui respon tanaman (Jirmanova et al 2016) terhadap pengaruh lingkungan atau perlakuan yang diberikan. Hasil analisis sidik ragam menunjukkan bahwa pemberian dosis pupuk N,P,K berpengaruh nyata terhadap tinggi tanaman, akan tetapi tidak ada interaksi antara jarak tanam dan dosis pupuk N,P,K serta secara mandiri penggunaan jarak tanam tidak berpengaruh nyata (Gambar 1).…”
Section: Tinggi Tanamanunclassified