2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2017.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different standoff distance and driving current on transducer during ultrasonic cavitation peening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 The cavitation erosion is influenced by multiple factors such as the standoff distance between the ultrasonic horn and the target specimen, chemical ingredients of the liquid and the frequency of ultrasound. 17,18 In recent years, the effects of material properties on the cavitation erosion have been of particular interest in practical applications that involve cavitation. 19 Different materials can manifest significantly different cavitation erosion characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The cavitation erosion is influenced by multiple factors such as the standoff distance between the ultrasonic horn and the target specimen, chemical ingredients of the liquid and the frequency of ultrasound. 17,18 In recent years, the effects of material properties on the cavitation erosion have been of particular interest in practical applications that involve cavitation. 19 Different materials can manifest significantly different cavitation erosion characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the ultrasonic cavitation peening is completed, the remaining material in water, such as metal and metal oxide particles, can easily be collected and recycled [17]. In addition to this advantage, this surface treatment process is inexpensive [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are a small number of studies related to the gap distance effect on the cavitation erosion in the available literature. 13,14 In the present study, flat aluminum samples were cavitated by using an indirect method and the reason for this is to determine the minimum gap distance that gives the highest delamination area in a particular zone. This will reduce the total test time and also energy-consumption costs for the industrial processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%