2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different substrates on the performance, bacterial diversity, and bacterial viability in microbial fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
225
3
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 602 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
16
225
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The MFC technology is a promising method of transforming bacterial metabolic energy into electricity (Chae et al, 2009). Traditional MFCs consist of two chambers in which electrodes are placed while a membrane separates the chambers from each other (Rahimnejad et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MFC technology is a promising method of transforming bacterial metabolic energy into electricity (Chae et al, 2009). Traditional MFCs consist of two chambers in which electrodes are placed while a membrane separates the chambers from each other (Rahimnejad et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous power generation by MFCs is largely dependent on its reliance on biofilm formation by the microbes to facilitate transfer of electrons from the biofilm to the anode for which the development of various microbial catalysts need to be found and employed (Angenent et al 2004). Although, several microbial strains such as Geobacter and Shewanella have been introduced in MFC technology for their ability to self-mediate the transfer of electrons (Chae et al 2009;Bond & Lovley 2003), other microbes employed involve assistance from electron mediators which inadvertently decrease the efficiency of the MFC system. The pre-requisites involved in MFC technology are expensive and fragile and do present a question about execution of these materials on a large scale.…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples for SEM analysis were prepared by a method described by Chae, Choi, Lee, Kim and Kim [23]. Parts of the CC were cut and removed from the anode chamber then rinsed with a sterile medium, and immediately fixed with an anaerobic solution of 2% glutaraldehyde and 1% formaldehyde.…”
Section: Biofilm Examination By Semmentioning
confidence: 99%