2013
DOI: 10.3923/thr.2013.1.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Thinning Techniques on Fruit Set, Leaf Area, Yield and Fruit Quality Parameters of Prunus persica, L. Batsch cv. Floridaprince

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
5
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
8
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found in other peach thinning researches, in which thinned plants showed lower yield due to the reduced number of fruits per plant (Scarpare Filho et al, 2000;El-Boray et al, 2013). According to Osborne & Robinson (2008), thinning reduces plant yield; however, it also promotes a significant increase in the average fruit size, improving commercial value, which compensates yield losses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were found in other peach thinning researches, in which thinned plants showed lower yield due to the reduced number of fruits per plant (Scarpare Filho et al, 2000;El-Boray et al, 2013). According to Osborne & Robinson (2008), thinning reduces plant yield; however, it also promotes a significant increase in the average fruit size, improving commercial value, which compensates yield losses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In 2014, plants at the pink bud, full bloom, and 5-mm fruit stages, in the average of treatments, showed higher fruit weight than those thinned at the 20-mm fruit stage. Performing early thinning on the flowering stages may increase the final fruit size, which can be explained by a reduction in the initial carbohydrate competition (El-Boray et al, 2013). An increment of fruit average weight due to early thinning was also observed by Szot (2010) in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While yield and berries per plant increased close to 2.3 and 4.0 times, respectively, as mean value of both plant ages, the canopy leaf area decreased by around 40%. This suggests that fruits have higher ability to attract assimilates than leaves and that fruits compete more between them than with shoots, as observed in several species (Gautier et al, 2001;Minchin et al, 2010;El-Boray et al, 2013). Our study showed that 'Brigitta' blueberry fruit weight, %DM and sugars decreased curvilinearly with increasing fruit load (Figure 1 and 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In fact, fruit weight and soluble sugar concentration typically decrease when the ratio between fruit number and leaf area (fruit load) is high. This is because the carbon source offer (mainly leaves) fails to meet the demand of carbon sinks (mainly fruits) (Seehuber et al, 2011;El-Boray et al, 2013). In order to balance fruit load, pruning is a crucial practice in blueberry production, with a positive effect on vegetative growth and fruit weight (Strick et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, for European plums, Pavanello et al (2018) found no effect of ammonium thiosulfate on reducing fruit set. Although, for peaches, El-Boray et al (2013) reported that ammonium thiosulfate at 3% v/v and soybean oil at 9% v/v reduced fruit set, and increased leaf area, indicating that somehow these treatments also stimulate vegetative growth, and maybe it causes restriction of assimilates for the flowers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%