2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of distance between impact point and hole position on the impact fatigue strength of composite laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior could be associated to stress concentration effect and the lower stiffness of the laminates due to the presence of the holes. Similar observations were reported by Santos et al 30 for composite laminates after to analyze the effect of distance between impact point and hole position.
Figure 7.Ultrasonic C-scan images of the impact side of composite plates tested at 10 J impact energy.
Figure 8.Ultrasonic C-scan images of the impact side of composite plates tested at 15 J impact energy.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This behavior could be associated to stress concentration effect and the lower stiffness of the laminates due to the presence of the holes. Similar observations were reported by Santos et al 30 for composite laminates after to analyze the effect of distance between impact point and hole position.
Figure 7.Ultrasonic C-scan images of the impact side of composite plates tested at 10 J impact energy.
Figure 8.Ultrasonic C-scan images of the impact side of composite plates tested at 15 J impact energy.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This behavior could be associated to stress concentration effect and the lower stiffness of the laminates due to the presence of the holes. Similar observations were reported by Santos et al 30 for composite laminates after to analyze the effect of distance between impact point and hole position.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Impact Damagesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether the distinction between the relevant sources of damage that is more harmful to each type of material is correct or not, it is expected that the exposure to operating conditions and external factors promotes the initiation, accumulation and propagation of damage [6]. This has led researchers to perform an extensive research on the influence of different load cases and external conditions on the damage tolerance of composite materials, such as: the influence of fabric architecture and resin toughness on the impact resistance ( [69,82,93,100,101,192,215,250,280] and [18-20, 100, 101, 115, 137, 209, 228, 243, 250], respectively) and damage tolerance ( [40,46,91,100,101,185] and [35,86,190,227,228,254], respectively) of CFRP, the effect of fracture toughness [1,82,115,136,222,240,241,243,280], repeated impact [15,17,107,117,210,211], impact geometry [8,16,27,34,76,…”
Section: Damage Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, at higher applied stresses, the cracks also emanated from the free edges. Santos et al [33] evaluated the low-velocity impact response of holed GFRP laminates. They observed that there was a significant influence on fatigue life in notched samples compared to the control samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%