1999
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.38.6650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Donor Space Charge on Electron Capture Processes in Quantum Well Infrared Photodetectors

Abstract: The effect of donor space charge on electron capture processes in AlGaAs/GaAs multiple quantum well infrared photodetectors (QWIPs) is studied using an ensemble Monte Carlo (MC) particle modeling. It is shown that the corrugation of the conduction band edge due to donor charges in the inter-QW barriers strongly influences the electron distribution over energies and the electric-field dependence of the electron capture rate. Vertical nonuniformity of the donor distributions in QWs results in an asymmetry in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) and (7)], the electron heating promotes higher values of the responsivity. As demonstrated by the particle Monte Carlo modeling of the electron capture into quantum wells (QWs) in heterostructures (albeit made of the standard material) with doped barriers [39], the doping affecting the potential profile in the barrier layers can result in a somewhat steeper drop of the capture efficiency with increasing voltage. The hot propagating electrons can provide a heating of the carriers localized in the GLs enhancing the electron thermionic escape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) and (7)], the electron heating promotes higher values of the responsivity. As demonstrated by the particle Monte Carlo modeling of the electron capture into quantum wells (QWs) in heterostructures (albeit made of the standard material) with doped barriers [39], the doping affecting the potential profile in the barrier layers can result in a somewhat steeper drop of the capture efficiency with increasing voltage. The hot propagating electrons can provide a heating of the carriers localized in the GLs enhancing the electron thermionic escape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the conditions for the formation of periodic domains are more relaxed for the QW structures with longer period This is in agreement with the results of MC simulations 18) which demonstrate that the spatially oscillating distributions of the average electron energy are pronounced in QW structures with L = 52 nm and longer, while they are smeared in the structures with same QW doping but shorter QW period (L = 34 nm). It is worth noting that at relatively large period of the QW structure the electric-field distributions in the barriers between QWs can be affected by the space charge of residual donors in these barriers 1,16,17) (see also refs. 24 and 29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 and references therein) and in MC simulations. 16,17) However, the electric-field dependence of the capture rate and, consequently, the capture parameter become complex when the electric field is not uniform. It was assumed in phenomenological models of the electron transport in multiple QW structures 9,11,14,15) that the capture rate into a QW is determined by an active field which, in turn, is determined by the electric fields at both sides of this QW.…”
Section: Equations Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The donor space charge in the barriers can be the origin of a non-monotonic variation of the capture probability and the current gain as functions of the QW structure period [7]. This is because the QWIPs are considered to be operating in normal condition [7]. The thickness and the depth of the QW are adopted in such a way that the QW contain only one bound level and the first excited level corresponds to the top of the barriers between the QWs.…”
Section: Basic Equation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%