2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of drip deficit irrigation and soil mulching on growth of common bean plant, water use efficiency and soil salinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mulching improves the water status in soil [ 14 ] by inhibiting evaporation through shielding the direct exposure of sunlight to the soil’s upper horizons [ 15 ], leading to increased crop yield [ 16 ]. For different mulch treatments, some researchers have recorded the highest soil salinity value when no mulching is applied in comparison with other mulching treatments, based on reduced evaporation from the soil surface as well as regulated soil water and salt movement [ 17 , 18 ]. Soil salinity has been reported to multiply with increasing deficit irrigation [ 17 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mulching improves the water status in soil [ 14 ] by inhibiting evaporation through shielding the direct exposure of sunlight to the soil’s upper horizons [ 15 ], leading to increased crop yield [ 16 ]. For different mulch treatments, some researchers have recorded the highest soil salinity value when no mulching is applied in comparison with other mulching treatments, based on reduced evaporation from the soil surface as well as regulated soil water and salt movement [ 17 , 18 ]. Soil salinity has been reported to multiply with increasing deficit irrigation [ 17 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For different mulch treatments, some researchers have recorded the highest soil salinity value when no mulching is applied in comparison with other mulching treatments, based on reduced evaporation from the soil surface as well as regulated soil water and salt movement [ 17 , 18 ]. Soil salinity has been reported to multiply with increasing deficit irrigation [ 17 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small differences in ETc between soil covers may result from the fast growth of the crop, which completely covered the planting row (where tensiometers were installed), reducing water evaporation in the soil, associated also with the daily irrigation management based on the matric potential, which kept the soil at field capacity, regardless of mulching condition, and minimized its effect on the reduction of evaporation and maintenance of water in the soil. In addition, the similar cumulative behavior of ETc under the cultivation conditions with straw can be associated with low rates of decomposition of the plant residues when subjected to drip irrigation (Souza et al, 2014;El-Wahed et al, 2017). In general, differences in evapotranspiration for a same crop can occur due to its growth responses to the local climate and soil physical-hydraulic conditions, and also due to the method used to obtain ETc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production performance was evaluated based on water use efficiency (WUE), considering the water volumes from irrigation depth and rainfall in the fresh weight production of summer squash fruits and only the water volume applied through irrigation (El-Wahed et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patanè et al [37] found that deficit irrigation at 50% of ETc for tomato plants resulted in no biomass (B) loss and high irrigation water-use efficiency. Experimental results obtained by Abd El-Wahed et al [38] suggested that deficit irrigation at 85% of ETc is favourable to save 15% of water provided, with no reduction in the bean crop. The study results of Samperio et al [39] offered deficit irrigation at 20% and 60% of ETc during stage II and postharvest, respectively, to "Angeleno" Japanese plum as a water-saving strategy, without negatively affecting crop yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%