2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Dural Substitute and Technique on Cranioplasty Operative Metrics: A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The postoperative infection rate following duraplasty with collagen matrix ranges from 2%–17%, with some variation according to the indication and site of placement [ 4 8 10 15 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ]. The postoperative infection rate of 6% in our series falls within an acceptable range and is comparable to rates of similar studies [ 4 10 26 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The postoperative infection rate following duraplasty with collagen matrix ranges from 2%–17%, with some variation according to the indication and site of placement [ 4 8 10 15 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ]. The postoperative infection rate of 6% in our series falls within an acceptable range and is comparable to rates of similar studies [ 4 10 26 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 14 , 20 ] As a result, various synthetic and biological substitutes are commonly used in dural repair. [ 19 ] HAM grafting has been used in various surgical fields since 1910, although its use in neurosurgery as a dural substitute was not reported till more than a century later. [ 15 ] In 2012, Tomita et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14,20] As a result, various synthetic and biological substitutes are commonly used in dural repair. [19] HAM grafting has been used in various surgical fields since 1910, although its use in neurosurgery as a dural substitute was not reported till more than a century later. [15] In 2012, Tomita et al reported the first ever use of HAM as a dural substitute in humans after which subsequent studies evaluating HAM as a dural substitute have also reported favorable characteristics of HAM for dural repair.…”
Section: Mean Age In Years (Range) Indication For Surgery (N)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When additional strength of the native dural layer and tissue gliding are required, duraplasty may benefit from dural substitutes (synthetic or autologous) to lower the incidence of adhesions between the neurological layers and therefore prevent postoperative tethering of the spinal cord [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%