2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of early Pliocene uplift on late Pliocene cooling in the Arctic–Atlantic gateway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
101
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
6
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). This timing is consistent with recent inferences on tectonic uplift events on Greenland 47 , the Barents Sea 21 The enhanced sea ice export through the (now) established deep-water AAG counterbalanced the heat transport associated with the enhanced MOC owing to the closure of the CAS. In contrast, modern sea ice limits, with the margin located above the borehole location throughout most of the year, were not reached until the INHG at ca.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5). This timing is consistent with recent inferences on tectonic uplift events on Greenland 47 , the Barents Sea 21 The enhanced sea ice export through the (now) established deep-water AAG counterbalanced the heat transport associated with the enhanced MOC owing to the closure of the CAS. In contrast, modern sea ice limits, with the margin located above the borehole location throughout most of the year, were not reached until the INHG at ca.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The chronostratigraphic framework in Hole 910C indicates the recovery of a complete Pliocene sequence 21 with the age model revealing a consistently high sedimentation rate (6-16 cm per kyr) 22 . The age model is based on new paleomagnetic and biostratigraphic data of Hole 910C and nearby Hole 911A (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…further inland (Moen, 1999). During the Piazencian the Scandinavian mountains had already been uplifted; they were, however, lower than at present (Anell et al, 2009;Knies et al, 2014). Anell et al (2009) report uplift of ∼ 1 km in northern Norway and 1-1.5 km in the southern Scandinavian mountains during the Neogene.…”
Section: Orographymentioning
confidence: 73%