2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of earthquake ground motions on soil liquefaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No sand boils were observed. As described by Unjoh et al (2012), the location of the levee array was affected by the post-event tsunami, which produced an inundation depth of 1 m on the landside of the levee where the toe instrument is located (Figure 3b). As a result, it is not clear if liquefaction manifestation may have occurred near the levee toe; any such evidence was lost as a result of the tsunami.…”
Section: Sample Case Historymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No sand boils were observed. As described by Unjoh et al (2012), the location of the levee array was affected by the post-event tsunami, which produced an inundation depth of 1 m on the landside of the levee where the toe instrument is located (Figure 3b). As a result, it is not clear if liquefaction manifestation may have occurred near the levee toe; any such evidence was lost as a result of the tsunami.…”
Section: Sample Case Historymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Figure 7 shows processed acceleration time series along with the pore water pressure time series recorded at the site during the M 9.1 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake. The piezometer installed at this site has a maximum measurable value of 101.3 kPa, or 1 atm (Unjoh et al, 2012). As a result, the pore water pressure readings temporarily plateau when this level is reached.…”
Section: Sample Case Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…− roseLDH, and sieved Cl − roseLDH were determined to be 2.1 × 10 −4 , 1.9 × 10 −4 , and 2.8 × 10 −4 cm s −1 , respectively, while the value for the CO 3 2− hexaLDH was found to be 3.2 × 10 −5 , which corresponds to the value for fine-grained silt. 41 These differences in the permeability coefficient may have been caused by factors such as variations in particle size distribution, especially in the case of large particle sizes and a 3D morphology. Detailed explanation on the effect of size distribution is given as follows: when mixing large and small particles, the small particles will fill the gaps between the large particles so that the spatial ratio decreases and a dense column is obtained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquefaction phenomenon is considered as one of the most devastating and complex behaviours that affect the soil due to earthquake loading. It was observed that geotechnical structures, such as river dikes, highway embankments, and earth dams, founded on saturated loose sandy ground have been frequently damaged during past major earthquakes (Matsuo 1996;Ozutsumi et al 2002;Unjoh et al 2012;Okamura et al 2013). According to the state of the art in the assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction performed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016), it is necessary to refine, develop, and implement performance-based approaches to evaluating liquefaction, including triggering, the geotechnical consequence of triggering, structural damage, and economic loss models to facilitate performance-based evaluation and design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%