2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ECAP temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
29
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
6
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, despite numerous studies [11][12][13][14][15] dealing with the examination of extensive grain refinement through ECAP on mechanical properties of these precipitation-hardened aluminum alloys, the effect of a UFG microstructure on precipitation sequence under post-deformation aging is relatively poorly known [5,9,[16][17][18]. It was shown that the formation of a UFG microstructure changes the post-deformation aging is relatively poorly known [5,9,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, despite numerous studies [11][12][13][14][15] dealing with the examination of extensive grain refinement through ECAP on mechanical properties of these precipitation-hardened aluminum alloys, the effect of a UFG microstructure on precipitation sequence under post-deformation aging is relatively poorly known [5,9,[16][17][18]. It was shown that the formation of a UFG microstructure changes the post-deformation aging is relatively poorly known [5,9,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this investigation, the following two main strengthening mechanisms were considered: (a) grain refinement (b) work hardening due to increase of dislocation density. The fragmented precipitates were too small to be resolved in TEM images, which lead to uncertainty in strength calculation from where, 0 is the lattice friction stress against the movement of dislocations and its value is ∼ 20 MPa for Al [25,32], the Hall-Petch coefficient (k) is a structure sensitive constant that represents the contribution of the grain boundaries to the related strengthening and is approximately equal to 0.12 MPa √ m , where d is the average grain size. The average grain sizes after the first and second ECAP passes were 2.6 µm and 650 nm.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is a shape factor normally ~ 0.3, M is the average Taylor factor assuming its value as 3.06 for a random textured material, G is the shear modulus and its value can be taken as 26 GPa, b is the length of burgers vector of dislocations, which is equal to 0.286 nm for octahedral slip in pure Al [25], is the dislocation density. The value of after first and second ECAP pass was taken as 3.98 × 14 14 , 4.8 × 14 14 (m −2 ), respectively, for 7075 alloy at room temperature [32]. Therefore, the estimation of total strength ( total ) can be written as follows: Applying the values for average grain size and dislocation density in Eq.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, temperature is effective to cause decreasing on high angle boundaries and transformation on metal phase. The die was heated up until 15 minutes to desire temperature furnace [16]. Higher temperatures of 200°C, 250°C, 450°C result in decreasing the size of grains and the microstructure during continues ECAP process [18].…”
Section: Pressing Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%