2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of electric field on the performance of soil electro-bioremediation with a periodic polarity reversal strategy

Abstract: In this work, it is studied the effect of the electric fields (within the range 0.0-1.5 V cm(-1)) on the performance of electrobioremediation with polarity reversal, using a bench scale plant with diesel-spiked kaolinite with 14-d long tests. Results obtained show that the periodic changes in the polarity of the electric field results in a more efficient treatment as compared with the single electro-bioremediation process, and it does not require the addition of a buffer to keep the pH within a suitable range.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A constant voltage gradient of 0.4 V/cm was maintained throughout the tests as recommended in the literature in order to prevent potential harm to the bacteria (Mizuno and Hori, 1988;Hassan et al, 2016). For the same reasons, periodic polarity reversal was applied every 24 h recommended for a better uniformity hence effectiveness of the treatment but also to prevent high pH gradients that could also be harmful to the bacteria (Mena et al, 2016). To ensure that both voltage and pH did not considerably change during treatment, measurements of these quantities were performed at 0 mm, 50 mm and 100 mm away from the electrodes locations of the sample throughout the treatment; pH of the solutions was also monitored inside both electrolyte chambers during the treatment.…”
Section: Electrokinetic (Ek) Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A constant voltage gradient of 0.4 V/cm was maintained throughout the tests as recommended in the literature in order to prevent potential harm to the bacteria (Mizuno and Hori, 1988;Hassan et al, 2016). For the same reasons, periodic polarity reversal was applied every 24 h recommended for a better uniformity hence effectiveness of the treatment but also to prevent high pH gradients that could also be harmful to the bacteria (Mena et al, 2016). To ensure that both voltage and pH did not considerably change during treatment, measurements of these quantities were performed at 0 mm, 50 mm and 100 mm away from the electrodes locations of the sample throughout the treatment; pH of the solutions was also monitored inside both electrolyte chambers during the treatment.…”
Section: Electrokinetic (Ek) Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, advantages of reversible changes in the polarity were also pointed out in the literature [38]. A comprehensive example was shown with the removal of diesel pollution from soils [39,40], in which the periodic reversion in the polarity did not only improve the efficiency but it also helped to regulate the pH (preventing extreme pH even near to the electrode wells) and to avoid the depletion of ionic species in the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Each day the polarity of electrodes was reverted. This arbitrary period was chosen taking into account previous experience of our group in the REKAB technology [44,45]. In this work, not only results of the REKAB technology but also a comparison with EKSF is going to be carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A constant voltage gradient of 0.4 V/cm was maintained throughout the tests as recommended in the literature in order to prevent potential harm to the bacteria [18][19]. Periodic polarity reversal was applied every 24 h, which is recommended for a better uniformity of the treatment but also to prevent high pH gradients that could be harmful to the bacteria [20]. To ensure that both voltage and pH did not change considerably during treatment, measurements of these quantities were performed at 0 mm, 50 mm and 100 mm away from the electrodes locations of the sample throughout the treatment; pH of the solutions was also monitored inside both electrolyte chambers during the treatment.…”
Section: Treatments and Implementation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%