2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of electron beam irradiation on the temperature of single AuGe nanoparticles in a TEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there is no guarantee of congruent evaporation of the liquid eutectic phase, that is, the compositions of the liquid and the vapor phases being in equilibrium can differ from each other. , At the same time, the eutectic temperature of Ag–Cu nanoparticles, which was assessed using the CALPHAD approach, , was somewhat higher than the T term temperature (Figure ). This could be due to the surface premelting effect, which preceded the eutectic melting in binary alloy nanoparticles. , …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, there is no guarantee of congruent evaporation of the liquid eutectic phase, that is, the compositions of the liquid and the vapor phases being in equilibrium can differ from each other. , At the same time, the eutectic temperature of Ag–Cu nanoparticles, which was assessed using the CALPHAD approach, , was somewhat higher than the T term temperature (Figure ). This could be due to the surface premelting effect, which preceded the eutectic melting in binary alloy nanoparticles. , …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the surface premelting effect, which preceded the eutectic melting in binary alloy nanoparticles. 62,63 Hence, we suppose two evaporation processes occur simultaneously at T term temperature, namely, the primary one, which forms a liquid phase at the specific surface planes of the nanoparticle with subsequent evaporation, and the secondary one, which is the sublimation of Ag.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we examine sample heating by the electrons as the possible mechanism behind the observed enhanced oxidation of the particles. There are several approaches to calculate electron beam-induced heating. ,,, Here, we consider the model developed by Liu and Risbud, which is intended for nanoparticles and assumes thermal loss only through the particles (ignoring the substrate). In this case, the temperature increase is calculated using the following equation: normalΔ T = 3 J Q 8 e c normalv α ρ R 2 0.25em ln ( 1 + 4 α t e R 2 ) where J is the current density, e is the electron charge, R is the particle radius, c v is the specific heat of the material, ρ is the mass density, α is the thermal diffusivity, and Q is the total energy loss of the electron going through the material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally heating can be reduced by reducing the probe size and usually unimportant in STEM [97]. For instance, no significant temperature rise was found for AuGe nanoparticle in STEM mode with the beam currents up to 1 nA (the temperature increment was only 2.3 K) [98]. While in parallel illumination TEM mode the temperature increment reached 25 K at 1.8 x 10 6 Am -2 .…”
Section: Ionization Damage (Radiolysis) Arises From the Inelastic Sca...mentioning
confidence: 99%