2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of equivalence ratio on the performance of the downdraft gasifier – An experimental and modelling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in the figure, both FCR and SGR increased as the increase of ER. This phenomenon is also reported in previous studies [17,18]. The FCR and SGR increased of about 30%-33% from ER 0.18 to ER 0.28.…”
Section: Flame Of Producer Gassupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As shown in the figure, both FCR and SGR increased as the increase of ER. This phenomenon is also reported in previous studies [17,18]. The FCR and SGR increased of about 30%-33% from ER 0.18 to ER 0.28.…”
Section: Flame Of Producer Gassupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A proper ER = lprj tu'vtr t%k lprj w'p%ux%plj'k%u t%k 18A high ER indicates more oxidation to gasify the biomass; a lower ER produces more char due to pyrolysis. As reported by (Upadhyay, Sakhiya, Panchal, Patel, & Patel, 2019), the optimum ER value is 0.24-0.36. Thus, in the present study the ER value varied from 0.25 to 0.35.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These values, however, cannot be considered constant for all downdraft gasifiers, as they depend on the size of the reaction zone, fuel and air consumption, particle sizes, and others. In addition, a gas-holder will improve the reliability of the power supply and expand the power range covered by the gasifier (including in the area of low loads) [98][99][100].…”
Section: Calculation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%