2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4927(00)00054-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ethanol on BOLD response to acoustic stimulation: implications for neuropharmacological fMRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, task-related increases of the BOLD signal fMRI studies during recovery, as well as their reductions to physiological levels after 6–12 months may be partially addressed to CBF changes. Overall, longitudinal normalization of the BOLD signal is associated with good outcome [4], [52], [53], [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, task-related increases of the BOLD signal fMRI studies during recovery, as well as their reductions to physiological levels after 6–12 months may be partially addressed to CBF changes. Overall, longitudinal normalization of the BOLD signal is associated with good outcome [4], [52], [53], [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous fMRI studies have shown the modulation of neuronal activation following acute alcohol ingestion in various types of crossover activation design with experimental tasks. These included auditory (Seifritz et al, 2000) and visual perception tasks (Calhoun et al, 2004a;Levin et al, 1998), goal-directed visuo-motor (Van Horn et al, 2006 and memory (Gundersen et al, 2008) tasks and even more complex scenarios like simulated driving (Allen et al, 2009;Calhoun et al, 2004b;Meda et al, 2009). Although previous studies have been extremely informative for visualizing alcohol effects on brain functionality and illustrating important implications of fMRI after drug administration, it has remained difficult in conventional task-based fMRI studies to determine whether differences in activation and taskby-drug interactions were due to a directly drug-affected brain function or to an altered behavioral performance secondary to an altered baseline state of the brain due to drug administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One has to estimate the peak time for the HRF and assume that it will be constant across all subjects and trials (113), anatomical regions (116), medications (90), ages (117), and vascular diseases (118), and that specific pathologies do not create a significant shift to the hemodynamic delay.…”
Section: Silent Event-related (Ser) (One Time-point) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%