Effect of ethanol-wet-bonding technique on resin–enamel bonds

Ayar, Muhammet Kerim; Yeşilyurt, Cemal; Kedıcı, Cemile; Yildirim, Tahsin

doi:10.1016/j.jds.2012.10.008

Cited by 4 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In this sense, several laboratory assignments have shown encouraging results regarding EWBT (Hosaka et al;Sadek et al, 2010a;Li et al;Nishitani et al;Ayar et al;Grégoire et al;Sauro et al, 2009b). Clinical trials are nevertheless scarce, especially RCCTs which included EWBT as experimental group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ethanol-Wet Bonding Technique: 18-month Clinical Evaluation

Barros¹,

Araújo

Braga

et al. 2016

Int. J. Odontostomat.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical performance up to 18 months of restorations placed using ethanol-wet bonding technique (EWBT) compared with the three-step etch-and-rinse (TSER) and one-step self-etching (OSSE) approaches. Ninety-three non-carious cervical lesions (31 for each group) were restored by one experienced operator in 17 patients under relatively dry conditions using gingival retraction cord, cotton rolls and saliva ejector. Each adhesive system was randomly allocated to one of randomized cervical lesions until the three groups were present in the same subject in equal amounts. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months by two blinded and calibrated examiners using the modified US Public Health Service guidelines (USPHS) for the following outcomes: retention (kappa= 1.00), staining and marginal adaptation (kappa=0.81) and analyzed by Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively. No significant differences were observed among groups after 18 months for any of the assessed criteria (p>0.05). The intra-group analysis performed by Cochran's test (for retention) and Wilcoxon test (for marginal adaptation/staining) revealed significant differences between the time intervals baseline/18 months in marginal adaptation (p= 0.0117) and retention (p= 0.0101) for OSSE and in marginal staining for TSER (0.0051) and EWBT (p= 0.0277) groups. The survival analysis for retention criteria and the overall clinical success were performed using a log-rank test and did not show significant differences among groups (p> 0.05). All three adhesives protocols presented similar clinical performance up to 18 months.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This technique is employed to chemically dehydrate the exposed collagen in order to avoid their collapse (Sadek et al, 2007a;Ayar et al). The ability to reduce the collagen fibril diameter has been demonstrated, thus increasing the interfibrillar spaces in hybrid layer (Hosaka et al;Li et al;Kim et al;Ayar et al;Sadek et al, 2010b).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethanol-Wet Bonding Technique: 18-month Clinical Evaluation

Barros¹,

Araújo

Braga

et al. 2016

Int. J. Odontostomat.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Komponen lainnya yang bersifat hidrofilik adalah 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) monomer. 6 Bagian hidrofilik berikatan dengan permukaan dentin yang lembab, sedangkan bagian hidrofobik berikatan dengan restorasi resin. 2 Penelitian di USA yaitu pada negara Alabama, Florida, Minnesota dan Scandinavia pada tahun 2010 di dapatkan 63% dokter gigi tidak menggunakan rubberdam pada saat melakukan restorasi gigi.…”

Section: Research Reportunclassified

“…12 Teknik ini tidak menyebabkan kolapsnya kolagen matriks. 6 Teknik ini juga dapat mecegah MMps untuk berikatan dengan kolagen fibril. 8 Menurut hasil penelitian Scheffel penggunaan ethanol wet bonding tidak meningkatkan kerusakan pulpa yang lebih besar dari pada water wet bonding dan dapat meningkatkan ikatan antara resin dengan dentin.…”

Section: Research Reportunclassified

Perbedaan kekuatan geser resin komposit nanohybrid dengan teknik water-wet bonding dan ethanol-wet bonding terhadap dentin

Dwiyanti

Effendy

Setyabudi

2019

CDJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Composite resins are widely used today to replace lost tooth structure. Bonding between dentin and resin is a complex process that is influenced by several factors; one of which is ambient humidity. During drying after acid etching, it is recommended not to leave the surface of preparation too dry or too wet. If the surface is too dry, collagen will shrink and collapse. As a result, the bonding material cannot penetrate into the cavity between the fibers. If the dentine is too wet, the bonding material will also be difficult to bind with the collagen, either chemically or mechanically. The amount of water around the collagen closely correlates with the moisture created around the dentin surface during the drying process and also whether or not a rubber dam was used during the preparation process. This study is aimed to compare water wet bonding and ethanol wet bonding technique to control humidity. One way of measuring the strength of bonding is to measure shear strength. Purpose: to compare water wet-bonding and ethanol wet-bonding technique.Materials and Methods: 32 samples of bovine teeth incisors were randomly divided into 2 group. Each group consists of sixteen samples. Group 1 is treated with water wet-bonding,group 2 is treated with ethanol wet-bonding. Results: There is significant difference between group 1 and group 2. Conclusion: Shear bond strength of the composite resin bonding on dentin with ethanol wet-bonding technique is higher than the shear bond strength of the composite bonding on dentin with water wet-bonding.

show abstract

“…The reports of these studies are promising towards longer durability and MMP inhibition. Studies have been done that assesses the micro tensile bond strength of ethanol wet bonding technique with commercially available dentin bonding agents in enamel, dentin and carious dentin [8,12,13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%