2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-011-0686-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of exposure to detergents and other chemicals on biomarkers of pulmonary response in exhaled breath from hospital cleaners: a pilot study

Abstract: The promising role of EBC analysis in biomonitoring of exposed workers was confirmed. It was also possible to identify the potential biomarkers of exposure to alkaline products (increased ammonium-EBC and pH-EBC levels) and potential biomarkers of oxidative stress (increased H(2)O(2)-EBC levels correlated with 4-HNE-EBC levels) in workers with no signs of airway diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In baker and hairdresser apprentices followed during their training, the increase in exhaled NO was associated with the occurrence of non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness [77]. Exhaled NO measurement was not increased in hospital staff exposed to detergents compared to non-exposed hospital staff, whereas other biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress were increased in the first group compared to the second group, which could suggest an irritating rather than an allergic mechanism [78]. A study of baker and hairdresser apprentices aiming at comparing the efficacy of exhaled NO measurement versus spirometry on the monitoring of their respiratory health has shown that each test provides unique information on the respiratory system and allows identifying subjects requiring more extensive investigations [79].…”
Section: Contribution Of Exhaled No Measurement In Occupational Asthmamentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In baker and hairdresser apprentices followed during their training, the increase in exhaled NO was associated with the occurrence of non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness [77]. Exhaled NO measurement was not increased in hospital staff exposed to detergents compared to non-exposed hospital staff, whereas other biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress were increased in the first group compared to the second group, which could suggest an irritating rather than an allergic mechanism [78]. A study of baker and hairdresser apprentices aiming at comparing the efficacy of exhaled NO measurement versus spirometry on the monitoring of their respiratory health has shown that each test provides unique information on the respiratory system and allows identifying subjects requiring more extensive investigations [79].…”
Section: Contribution Of Exhaled No Measurement In Occupational Asthmamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Chez des apprentis boulangers et coiffeurs suivis pendant leur apprentissage, l'augmentation du NO expiré était associée à l'apparition d'une hyperréactivité bronchique non spécifique[77]. La mesure du NO expiré n'était pas augmentée chez des agents hospitaliers exposés à des détergents par rapport à des agents hospitaliers non exposés, alors que d'autres biomarqueurs d'inflammation et de stress oxydatif étaient augmentés dans le premier groupe par rapport au second, pouvant suggérer un mécanisme irritatif plutôt qu'allergique[78]. Une étude auprès d'apprentis boulangers et coiffeurs, visant à comparer la performance de la mesure du NO expiré et de la spirométrie dans la surveillance de leur santé respiratoire, a observé que chaque examen apporte des informations uniques sur le système respiratoire et permet d'identifier des sujets nécessitant des investigations plus poussées[79].…”
unclassified
“…Direction and magnitude of bias was examined in three studies [24,30,31]. Study size was not explained in one cross-sectional study [29]. It was unclear if 3 studies were free of commercial funding [18,21,29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier and current research is also limited by the failure to use simple non-invasive biomarker measurements that have been recently developed [14][15][16] and validated [17][18][19].…”
Section: Figure 1 Publications On Religion and Health (Pubmed)mentioning
confidence: 99%