1995
DOI: 10.1306/8d2b1b60-171e-11d7-8645000102c1865d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Faulting on Fluid Flow in Porous Sandstones: Geometry and Spatial Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the interpretation that albite veins precipitated from hydrothermal fluids, produced by the mixing between metamorphic and magmatic fluids, reinforces the interpretation of an existing relay zone during this time, as these zones are preferential pathways for ascendant fluid flow, including hydrothermal, magmatic and metamorphic fluids, and therefore for cement precipitation (Antonellini and Aydin, 1995;Rotevatn et al, 2007;Fossen and Rotevatn, 2016). Moreover, because of the low porosity and permeability of the phyllites, the hydrothermal upflow was especially focused through the relay fractures that increased the permeability.…”
Section: Structural Evolution and Fracture Development Of The Turó Desupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In addition, the interpretation that albite veins precipitated from hydrothermal fluids, produced by the mixing between metamorphic and magmatic fluids, reinforces the interpretation of an existing relay zone during this time, as these zones are preferential pathways for ascendant fluid flow, including hydrothermal, magmatic and metamorphic fluids, and therefore for cement precipitation (Antonellini and Aydin, 1995;Rotevatn et al, 2007;Fossen and Rotevatn, 2016). Moreover, because of the low porosity and permeability of the phyllites, the hydrothermal upflow was especially focused through the relay fractures that increased the permeability.…”
Section: Structural Evolution and Fracture Development Of The Turó Desupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The overall global structure of a fault zone includes a fault core surrounded by damage zone domains (Chester and Logan, 1986;Antonellini and Aydin, 1994;Caine et al, 1996Caine et al, , 2010Heynekamp et al, 1999;Jourde et al, 2002;Fossen et al, 2005;Faulkner et al, 2010;Bense et al, 2013). The damage zone has characteristics that vary according to the rock type: 1) For brittle consolidated rocks, in the model of Caine et al (1996) the damage zone is defined as an increased fracture density and contains minor faults compared to the protolith.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage zone has characteristics that vary according to the rock type: 1) For brittle consolidated rocks, in the model of Caine et al (1996) the damage zone is defined as an increased fracture density and contains minor faults compared to the protolith. 2) For porous sandstones, models of the damage zone from Heynekamp et al, (1999) modified by Loveless et al, (2011), include minor faults and deformation bands (Antonellini and Aydin, 1994;Flodin et al, These processes interact with one another, because of their potential co-eval formation (Clauer et al, 2008;Worden and Morad, 2009).They have an impact on the pore network and reservoir quality of sandstones, though their quantification is rarely determined (Bjorlykke and Egeberg, 1993;Bjorkum, 1996;Worden and Burley, 2003;Eichhubl et al, 2009;Henares et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key architectural elements are the fault core and bounding damage zone ( Figure 2), both of which differ structurally and mechanically from the undeformed protolith (Caine et al 1996;Knott et al 1996;Kim et al 2004). Grain-size reduction and/or mineral precipitation in the fault core generally yields lower permeability than undeformed protolith (Antonellini and Aydin 1994;Evans et al 1997 permeability relative to both the core and the undeformed protolith, and the juxtaposition of these elements ( Figure 2) creates major permeability contrasts within the fault zone (Goddard and Evans 1995;Caine et al 1996;Wibberley and Shimamoto 2002). Damage zone permeability can be 2 to 3 orders of magnitude greater than the permeability of fractured protolith and four to six orders of magnitude greater than the fault core permeability (Caine et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%