1987
DOI: 10.2527/jas1987.6441170x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Feeding Frequency on Forage Fiber and Nitrogen Utilization in Sheep

Abstract: Four crossbred wether lambs (38 kg) with permanent ruminal and abomasal cannulae were used in a 4 X 4 Latin square arrangement of treatments to determine the effect of feeding frequency (FF) on forage fiber and N utilization. Lambs were offered 900 g of good quality (vegetative) Kentucky-31 tall fescue hay in equal portions either 2, 4, 8 or 16 times daily. Water consumption increased (P less than .05; linear) with increased FF. Apparent total tract digestibilities of dry matter, organic matter and cell wall c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, because corn represented 30% of the concentrate, relatively rumen-resistant starch was fed in our study. 21,26,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Fermentation patterns and degree of carbohydrate digestion in the rumen influence intestinal digestion, because starch that is resistant to microbial digestion in the rumen (ie, bypass starch) is partially digested enzymatically in the small intestine and partially fermented in the large intestine (postruminal fermentation), with the rest being excreted in the feces. Furthermore, specimens of ruminal fluid were collected after completion of the myoelectric measurements to avoid creating disturbances of the tracings and, possibly, external effects on myoelectric activity of the colon by introducing the sample collection device into the rumen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, because corn represented 30% of the concentrate, relatively rumen-resistant starch was fed in our study. 21,26,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Fermentation patterns and degree of carbohydrate digestion in the rumen influence intestinal digestion, because starch that is resistant to microbial digestion in the rumen (ie, bypass starch) is partially digested enzymatically in the small intestine and partially fermented in the large intestine (postruminal fermentation), with the rest being excreted in the feces. Furthermore, specimens of ruminal fluid were collected after completion of the myoelectric measurements to avoid creating disturbances of the tracings and, possibly, external effects on myoelectric activity of the colon by introducing the sample collection device into the rumen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because ruminants do not eat continuously throughout the day but eat in bouts (Burt and Dunton, 1967;Friggens et al, 1998), flavor variety may influence daily intake through changes in the distribution of feeding events over time (i.e., through changes in the feeding pattern). In addition, changes in feeding frequency may lead to physiological changes in the animal, such as a modification in the profiles of hormones involved in the control of feed intake (Bello et al, 2009) and nutrient utilization (Bunting et al, 1987). Lambs in the diversity treatment showed the greatest leptin and IGF-1 plasma concentrations (Table 5 and Figure 3, respectively) and lambs in the plain treatment showed the least plasma insulin concentrations at 200 and 300 min postfeeding (Figure 3), which would indicate that glucose supply at these times was low.…”
Section: Itemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feeding a split ration has been used in efforts to alleviate the impact of high heat and humidity, conditions that are common in the U.S. Virgin Islands (Gaughan et al, 1996;Brosh et al, 1998;Ominski et al, 2002;Davis et al, 2003). Other studies have been done to evaluate the impact of feeding frequency on rumen characteristics and nutrient absorption (Bunting et al, 1987;Soto-Navarro et al, 2000;Robles et al, 2007). Most of these studies have been conducted with either feedlot or dairy cattle, and very little has been done with small ruminants fed concentrate rations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%