2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fiber type and combinations on the mechanical, physical and thermal stability properties of polyester hybrid composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each phase contributes properties to the composite to synergistically form the functional characteristics, eventually preventing crack propagation in three‐dimensional space . The nature of the fiber, type of matrix, and interface properties can significantly influence the properties of the composite materials …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each phase contributes properties to the composite to synergistically form the functional characteristics, eventually preventing crack propagation in three‐dimensional space . The nature of the fiber, type of matrix, and interface properties can significantly influence the properties of the composite materials …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Author(s) agree that this article remain permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License based composite studied that plain EP/PP (poly propylene) fiber composite had higher impact energy than plain EP/CF where CF is carbon fiber. The modulus of elasticity and tensile strength of Kevlar fiber reinforced polyester composite was reported higher than that of glass fiber reinforced composite by 75 and 25% respectively (Isa et al, 2013). In the same work, the hybrid of the fibers in the same matrix was reported to have better mechanical properties than the monolithic composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The bands from 1593 to 1490 cm −1 , weaker in intensity, could be assigned to different C H vibration modes from the aromatic ring and the bands located at 1423 and 1378 cm −1 may correspond to the scissoring and rocking vibration modes of the alkyl groups. The strong sharp band occurring at 1268 cm −1 (IWB) and respectively 1279 cm −1 (IRB) is attributed to the twisting vibration mode of CH 2 groups [24,25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%