2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.576.280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Fibre Size on the Tensile Properties of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fibre Composites

Abstract: The principal aim of this project was to achieve a better understanding of the various parameters that contribute to the tensile properties. These parameters were manipulated in order to improve and produced PPnanoclay/ Polypropylene (PP) reinforced oil palm empty fruit bunch composite material (OPEFB). OPEFB fibre was treated with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in order to improve the tensile properties of the composites. Thus, in this study the oil palm empty fruit bunch fibres were used as a filler and PPnanoclay/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the formulation EP-RVF 20-5 has the lowest absorption rate (36.12%), while the formulation EP-RVF 40-15 has the highest absorption rate (71%) compared to EP-RVF 0. The absorption rate of EP-RVF is comparable to the literature on plant fibre-reinforced composites presented in Table 2 [41,[79][80][81][82][83] and could be explained by the fact that RVF is very hydrophilic with an absorption rate between 303% and 662% [21]. This suggests that treatment to reduce the high hydrophilicity of RVF should be consid-ered before introducing it as a composite reinforcement, as suggested by Huisken et al [41].…”
Section: Mechanical Characterisation Of Ep-rvf In Three-pointsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thus, the formulation EP-RVF 20-5 has the lowest absorption rate (36.12%), while the formulation EP-RVF 40-15 has the highest absorption rate (71%) compared to EP-RVF 0. The absorption rate of EP-RVF is comparable to the literature on plant fibre-reinforced composites presented in Table 2 [41,[79][80][81][82][83] and could be explained by the fact that RVF is very hydrophilic with an absorption rate between 303% and 662% [21]. This suggests that treatment to reduce the high hydrophilicity of RVF should be consid-ered before introducing it as a composite reinforcement, as suggested by Huisken et al [41].…”
Section: Mechanical Characterisation Of Ep-rvf In Three-pointsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The tensile modulus gradually increased with an increase in filler loading from 20%wt (1.32 GPa) to 40% wt i.e (1.62 GPa). This observation is in agreement with other researchers [7,8,9,10]. Incorporation of rigid fiber into polymer matrix reduced the matrix mobility, resulting increased in stiffness and higher tensile modulus of the composites.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Meanwhile the lowest fracture toughness is 0.89 MPa.m 1/2 which belongs to composites filled with 355 µm OPEFB fibers (largest size). The trend of fracture toughness is slightly the same with its tensile strength that was reported in other publication [7]. Comparing the trend of fracture toughness result against the increasing of OPEFB fiber size with their respective izod impact strength that has been published [9] somewhere else, found out that the trend is in contrast.…”
Section: Fig2 Particle Size Distribution Of Opefb Fiberssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This behavior is due to the weak interfacial interaction between matrix and filler, leading to weak interfacial bonding. Besides that, this trend could be due to the non uniform dispersion of bio-fibers within the polymer matrix impairs the mechanical properties [7]. The highest fracture toughness is 1.16 MPa.m 1/2 at 180 µm of OPEFB fiber size (smallest size in this study) due to resistant enough with PP matrix.…”
Section: Fig2 Particle Size Distribution Of Opefb Fibersmentioning
confidence: 72%