2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.393.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact Toughness of Kenaf Powder, Polypropylene and Kevlar

Abstract: mpact and tensile properties were carried out on Kenaf Powder (K) Polypropylene (PP) reinforced with Kevlar (KV) composites plate prepared in-house using hot press technique. The effect of bonding agent, Maleic Anhydride grafted Polypropylene (MAPP), on the strength and impact toughness was also conducted. The size of kenaf powder used was limited to 100μm. The kenaf/polypropylene composite designated as KPP specimens were tested through tensile test (ASTM D 638) and izod test (ASTM D256) for 20-40% weight rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the TEM analysis, it was observed that AMUF was finely dispersed in the PP matrix with a fibroid morphology [Figure (a)], however, unmodified MUF exhibited agglomeration in the PP matrix [Figure (b)]. The impact and modulus value of the PP‐AMUF nanocomposite has been compared with different types of the PP nanocomposites and presented in Table . As expected, the property values for each nanocomposite differed from others due to a variety of factors such as preparation methods, type of nanofillers, interfacial adhesion, filler fraction, filler dimensions, test conditions, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From the TEM analysis, it was observed that AMUF was finely dispersed in the PP matrix with a fibroid morphology [Figure (a)], however, unmodified MUF exhibited agglomeration in the PP matrix [Figure (b)]. The impact and modulus value of the PP‐AMUF nanocomposite has been compared with different types of the PP nanocomposites and presented in Table . As expected, the property values for each nanocomposite differed from others due to a variety of factors such as preparation methods, type of nanofillers, interfacial adhesion, filler fraction, filler dimensions, test conditions, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It can accordingly be concluded that the addition of a small amount (2-3%) of Kevlar fibres can be used as a reinforcement to improve the strength and toughness of the hybrid. In another study, Kamardin et al [12] have investigated the mechanical performance of hybrid Kevlar/kenaf powder reinforced polypropylene composites, in 20 to 40% weight ratio of kenaf powder. It was observed that hybridization effects provided improved mechanical properties for this hybrid structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Kamardin et al. [12] have investigated the mechanical performance of hybrid Kevlar/kenaf powder reinforced polypropylene composites, in 20 to 40% weight ratio of kenaf powder. It was observed that hybridization effects provided improved mechanical properties for this hybrid structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%