2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-005-0157-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of film thickness on the evolution of annealing texture in sputtered copper films

Abstract: Microstructural evolution during elevated temperature annealing of sputter deposited copper (Cu) films was investigated by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Analysis of films was performed both in situ using a heating stage, and by ex-situ observation of microstructural evolution. It was noted that not only is the Cu film texture and grain size a function of film thickness, but also that the fraction of twin boundaries present in the material is strongly dependent upon film thickness. This is explained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of a strong {111} texture typically observed in FCC metal thin films is thought to be due to the minimization of the surface/interface energies at the free surface and film substrate interface, as for all FCC metals, the close-packed (111) surface has the lowest surface energy [14]. This is illustrated in figure 2.6, where the surface energy was calculated with the broken bond model and the energy of 2.610 J/m² was used [64][65]. In this case the (111) orientation is thought to minimize both the surface and interface energies, which means that the growth of grains with {111} texture is generally favoured over growth of grains with other orientations.…”
Section: Surface/interface Energy Driven Abnormal Grain Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of a strong {111} texture typically observed in FCC metal thin films is thought to be due to the minimization of the surface/interface energies at the free surface and film substrate interface, as for all FCC metals, the close-packed (111) surface has the lowest surface energy [14]. This is illustrated in figure 2.6, where the surface energy was calculated with the broken bond model and the energy of 2.610 J/m² was used [64][65]. In this case the (111) orientation is thought to minimize both the surface and interface energies, which means that the growth of grains with {111} texture is generally favoured over growth of grains with other orientations.…”
Section: Surface/interface Energy Driven Abnormal Grain Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…he formation of such texture indicated an alignment of the close packed {111} planes with substrate surface. his texture is oten observed in deposited copper ilms and commonly attributed to minimization of surface energy [22,23]. It was also noteworthy that this texture component notably strengthened with annealing temperature [11].…”
Section: Microstructurementioning
confidence: 84%
“…According to Ref. [44][45][46], the change in the film thickness can lead to changes in structure, which causes changes in the film properties. In this regard, we have synthesized four-layer deposited films with an average thickness of *200 nm and 10-layer deposited films with an average thickness of *450 nm, both with nanorod-like grains (d av.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%