2021
DOI: 10.14445/22315381/ijett-v69i5p212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Fly ash, Silica fume, Glass Fiber and Polypropylene Fiber on Strength Properties of Composite Fiber Reinforced High Performance Concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rao et al [13] studied the deterioration and the relative sulphate resistance of HPC in severe sulphate environments and suggested using Fly ash (FA) by partially replacing natural pozzolana for enhanced performance. Present authors also have investigated the effect of fly ash, metakaolin, and silica fume based composite fiber-reinforced HPC on strength and durability properties and concluded the viability of using fly ash, metakaolin, silica fume, and composite fibers in CFRHPC production for enhanced strength and durability properties [14][15][16]. The widespread application of FA and MK in the construction industry is the result of extensive investigations on the use of FA and MK in concrete during the past two decades [17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Rao et al [13] studied the deterioration and the relative sulphate resistance of HPC in severe sulphate environments and suggested using Fly ash (FA) by partially replacing natural pozzolana for enhanced performance. Present authors also have investigated the effect of fly ash, metakaolin, and silica fume based composite fiber-reinforced HPC on strength and durability properties and concluded the viability of using fly ash, metakaolin, silica fume, and composite fibers in CFRHPC production for enhanced strength and durability properties [14][15][16]. The widespread application of FA and MK in the construction industry is the result of extensive investigations on the use of FA and MK in concrete during the past two decades [17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The incorporation of 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75% PP fibres reduced the fluidity by 2.8, 5.55 and 8.33%, respectively. Patil and Patil [38] incorporated 1.5% PP fibres (length 12 or 20 mm), by volume, into Class F FA-based concretes activated with NaOH and sodium silicate solution. The results showed lower workability with including PP fibres.…”
Section: Polypropylene Fibresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patil and Patil [38] found higher 28 days mechanical strength of Class F FA-based geopolymer concretes with including 1.5% PP fibres (length 12 mm or 20 mm), by volume. The compressive strength slightly increased with increasing fibres length.…”
Section: Polypropylene Fibresmentioning
confidence: 99%